cost effective oriented

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "cost effective oriented" is not correct in standard written English.
A more appropriate phrase would be "cost-effective" or "oriented towards cost-effectiveness." Example: "Our new strategy is cost-effective and will help us save money in the long run."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Substantial savings are expected to arise from the extended screening interval, the reduced rate of recalls, the 50% rate of archived slides requiring no further review from the cost-effective oriented quality control and from the reduced screening time of those slides requiring manual review.

British Journal of Cancer

It is unique in approach because it is comprehensive, inclusive, cost effective, and progress oriented.

Unicef

This can be cost effective".

The New York Times

This is an easy, cost effective solution.

The New York Times

"It's very cost effective".

The New York Times

Sometimes, leasing is cost effective.

The New York Times

It is more cost effective.

The New York Times

But is it cost effective?

The New York Times

Which is more cost effective or important?

The Guardian

Good social work is cost effective.

The Guardian

They're also more cost effective.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a focus on cost-effectiveness, use the established adjective "cost-effective" or rephrase to "oriented towards cost-effectiveness" for clarity and grammatical correctness.

Common error

Avoid combining "cost effective" directly with "oriented". It's grammatically awkward. Use "cost-effective" as a single adjective, or rephrase to use "oriented towards cost-effectiveness" for better clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cost effective oriented" attempts to combine the concept of cost-effectiveness with a directional focus. However, it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI indicates that this combination is not standard English.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "cost effective oriented" is grammatically incorrect and not recognized as standard English according to Ludwig AI. The intended meaning aims to combine cost-effectiveness with a directional focus. For grammatically sound alternatives, it's best to use ""cost-effective"" as an adjective or rephrase to ""oriented towards cost-effectiveness"". When describing a focus on value and efficiency, these alternatives provide clarity and grammatical accuracy in professional and business contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

cost-effective

A more concise and grammatically correct term conveying efficiency in relation to cost.

oriented towards cost-effectiveness

A grammatically correct phrase that explicitly states the focus on achieving cost-effectiveness.

cost conscious

Focuses on being aware of and aiming to minimize costs.

economical

Emphasizes the avoidance of waste and efficient use of resources.

value-driven

Highlights the focus on maximizing value relative to cost.

efficiency-focused

Implies a primary emphasis on achieving optimal efficiency.

budget-oriented

Stresses adherence to a budget and financial prudence.

profit-minded

Concentrates on generating profit and financial gain.

resourceful

Describes the ability to find clever ways to overcome difficulties, often involving efficient resource use.

lean

Emphasizes streamlining processes and minimizing waste in operations.

FAQs

Is "cost effective oriented" grammatically correct?

No, the phrase "cost effective oriented" is not grammatically correct. A better alternative is to use the adjective "cost-effective" or the phrase "oriented towards cost-effectiveness".

What does "cost-effective" mean?

The term "cost-effective" means producing good results for the amount of money spent. It implies a good value or return on investment.

How can I rephrase "cost effective oriented" to be more accurate?

Instead of "cost effective oriented", consider using "cost-effective", "oriented towards cost-effectiveness", or "value-driven" depending on the specific context.

When is it appropriate to use "oriented towards cost-effectiveness"?

Use "oriented towards cost-effectiveness" when you want to emphasize the active focus or direction of a process, strategy, or decision-making towards achieving cost-effectiveness. For example, "Our business strategy is "oriented towards cost-effectiveness"".