Similar(60)
Cost-effective expression in Escherichia coli, inclusion body purification and solubilization followed modified standard protocols.
This efficient and cost-effective expression system facilitates large-scale production and purification of dipetarudin for further structural, functional and pharmacological investigations.
From these results, the DO-controlled nar promoter system developed in this study can be considered a reliable and cost-effective expression system for protein production, especially in large-scale fermentation, as an alternative to the pET/BL DE3) system.
Additionally, with a large variety of vectors, promoters and selection markers to choose from, combined with the accumulated knowledge on industrial-scale fermentation techniques and the current advances in the post-genomic technology, it is possible to design more cost-effective expression systems in order to meet the increasing demand for recombinant proteins and glycoproteins.
Our aim was to produce RC-1 in recombinant form in E. coli as a cost-effective expression system.
Plants are an advantageous system for the cost-effective expression of large amounts of safe complex recombinant proteins.
Thus, plant expression systems will be further improved for production of VLPs-based vaccines with respect to their proper glycomodification and the rapid and cost-effective expression.
The EXPRSS method by all these criteria is highly suitable for cost-effective expression profiling of large numbers of mRNA samples.
We successfully produced bioactive recombinant RC-1 in E. coli as a cost-effective expression system that can be developed for large-scale production.
Implementing this approach may involve large numbers of comparisons and thus requires a cost effective means of expression profiling.
The aim of this study was to develop a reliable and accurate real-time PCR method using SYBR Green I technology that allows cost effective measurements of the expression levels of the hIL-5Rα splice variants in human tissue and peripheral blood.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com