Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
London Met has achieved this by cutting out all but the most popular and cost effective courses.
Similar(59)
An individual cost/benefit relation ≤ 100 €/% was found in 38% versus 30% of the respective cohort patients (Fisher p = 0.278); accordingly the introduction of an interdisciplinary clinical pathway on TKA did not significantly change the fraction of individually cost effective treatment courses from the health care providers' perspective in terms of this primary cost effectiveness parameter.
Accordingly, in terms of the primary endpoint of this evaluation, the sub cohorts with and without attendance to the pathway-associated briefing showed 36% versus 23% individually cost effective patient courses (individual MCER ≤ 100 €/%); however; the two sub cohorts after pathway implementation did not signficantly differ in this primary cost effectiveness endpoint (Fisher p = 0.166).
It is illustrated by Table 4: patients with a preoperative WOMAC index > 40% showed individually cost effective process courses in terms of an MCER ≤ 100 €/% in 52% (first cohort) versus 56%and47%7% (sub cohorts without and with briefing after pathway implementation, respectively).
Evaluations can be used to improve programmes as they roll out and/or can try to estimate whether and how particular aims were achieved and whether this was better and more cost effective than other courses of action.
Conclusions There is no strong evidence of a difference in cost between the treatments, but clinical and cost data together indicate that using both drugs together may be most cost effective over the course of the illness.
Therefore the need for an efficient and cost effective liposomal AmB, for short course treatment of leishmaniasis, having long-lasting protective effect remains.
Of course it has to be cost effective, too.
"Of course we need to see how cost effective it would be to offer these vitamins free to everyone; but quite often the benefits outweigh the costs".
This can be cost effective".
It is more cost effective.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com