cost effective cost

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "cost effective cost" is not correct and is redundant in written English.
It can be used when discussing the financial efficiency of a product or service, but the phrase itself is not appropriate. Example: "The cost effective cost of the new software makes it an attractive option for small businesses."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

The probabilistic uncertainty analysis depicted in figures 3 and 4 also show that these interventions remain highly cost effective (cost effectiveness ratio <$Int2000 per DALY averted) even after allowing for plausible variations in costs and effects.

British Medical Journal

To handle this aspect of reporting for such a wide range of interventions, we classified interventions according to their degree of cost effectiveness (not cost effective, cost effective, or very cost effective) in order to ascertain order of magnitude differences in cost effectiveness.

British Medical Journal

The likelihood of home phototherapy being cost effective (cost acceptability) was 62.1% and 67.9% respectively.

British Medical Journal

Conclusions about costs were assumed to be positive if there was a statement in the publication that the health technology assessed reduced costs, was cost effective, cost beneficial, or cost utilitarian, and negative if the technology assessed had higher cost, and was not cost effective, cost beneficial, or cost utilitarian.

British Journal of Cancer

Current policy identifying and remediating existing homes with high radon levels is, however, neither cost effective (cost per QALY gained £36 800) nor effective in reducing lung cancer mortality.

British Medical Journal

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

Li et al. (18) reviewed the cost-effectiveness of 44 interventions for diabetes and classified most as cost-saving, very cost-effective (cost-effectiveness ratio between $0 and $25,000 per QALY), or cost-effective (cost-effectiveness ratio between $25,001 and $50,000 per QALY).

Diabetes Care

They predicted it would be cost-effective, cost neutral, or even cost-negative.

BMC Family Practice

The second paper found that HCV screening and treatment of prisoners was not cost-effective (cost per QALY €78,498) [ 72].

BMC Infectious Diseases

Routine referral for HIV testing of all TB patients in India would be considered very cost-effective (cost-effectiveness ratio <1x per capita GDP) [20].

Plosone

While HZ vaccination is mostly considered cost-effective, cost-effectiveness of varicella vaccination primarily depends on the in- or exclusion of exogenous boosting in the model.

BMC Public Health

Supplementation was more cost-effective (cost-effectiveness ratio (CER)=€35 165 per patient discharged alive) than standard, non-supplemented PN (CER=€40 156 per patient discharged alive), and it resulted in mean cost savings of €4991 per patient discharged alive or €1047 per patient admitted to the hospital.

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "cost effective cost" as it is redundant. Instead, focus on using "cost-effective" as an adjective to describe a product, service, or strategy that provides good value for its price.

Common error

Do not repeat "cost" when you already have "cost effective". The adjective "cost-effective" already implies it's about the cost; avoid using the word "cost" again in the same phrase.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cost effective cost" attempts to describe something that provides good value or benefit relative to its cost. However, according to Ludwig AI, it is redundant, as "cost-effective" already encompasses the idea of a beneficial cost relationship. It is typically used as an adjective.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "cost effective cost" is considered incorrect due to its redundancy, as highlighted by Ludwig AI. The term "cost-effective" already implies a positive relationship between cost and benefit. Instead of using the redundant phrase, opt for alternatives like "cost-effective pricing", "affordable price", or describing something as offering "value for money". Remember to use "cost-effective" as an adjective to accurately describe items, strategies or solutions that offer excellent value relative to their price. By avoiding this phrasing error, you can communicate more clearly and effectively.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Cost-effective pricing

Focuses on the pricing strategy that offers good value.

Affordable price

Highlights the affordability aspect of the cost.

Economical expenditure

Emphasizes the economical nature of the spending.

Efficient spending

Highlights the efficiency in resource allocation.

Value for money

Stresses the balance between cost and the value received.

Budget-friendly option

Indicates that the option fits well within a budget.

Low-cost alternative

Highlights the low cost compared to other options.

Reasonable expenses

Suggests that the costs are justified and not excessive.

Smart investment

Focuses on the wisdom of spending on something worthwhile.

Prudent spending

Emphasizes careful and wise expenditure.

FAQs

Why is "cost effective cost" considered redundant?

The phrase "cost effective cost" is redundant because "cost effective" already implies a beneficial relationship to cost. Using "cost" again is unnecessary and grammatically awkward.

What are some alternatives to "cost effective cost"?

Instead of "cost effective cost", consider using "cost-effective" pricing, an "affordable price", or describing something as "value for money".

How can I use the term "cost-effective" correctly in a sentence?

Use "cost-effective" as an adjective. For example: "This new strategy is very "cost-effective"" or "We need to find a "cost-effective" solution."

Is there a difference between "cost-effective" and "economical"?

While both terms relate to saving money, "cost-effective" emphasizes the value received for the money spent, while "economical" simply implies using resources sparingly. A "cost-effective" solution may not always be the most economical, but it provides the best balance of cost and benefit.