cost at stake

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "cost at stake" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the potential financial implications or risks involved in a situation or decision. Example: "Before making a final decision, we need to consider the cost at stake in this investment."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

As arresting as this statistic may be, it does not convey the ultimate economic costs at stake.

The Washington Post

Many of those players have high-profile matters pending before the agency, with potentially hundreds of millions of dollars in regulatory costs at stake.

The New York Times

With those kinds of costs at stake, hiring hackers like Long isn't cheap: For basic vulnerability assessment, CSC, which is based in El Segundo, Calif., charges a minimum of $35,000.

Forbes

"Certainly, reputational cost is at stake, but we can think of other creative ways to perhaps impose costs as well," she said without elaborating.

Vice

With another $500 million in cost savings at stake, Bestfoods executives could argue that their shareholders deserve a higher price per share than Unilever has offered.

The New York Times

The association was stronger with OFC when delay-related costs were at stake, and stronger with ACC when effort-related costs were at stake.

eLife

Billions of dollars in cleanup costs are at stake.

The New York Times - Science

Individuals' psychological well-being (and their treatment costs) are at stake when we talk about what "works".

The New York Times

More precision is needed in actual policy decision-making where large populations and opportunity costs are at stake.

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

When a company's stock price is at stake, the costs of activism may be worth the benefits in shareholder returns.

Harvard Business Review

More than just cost overruns are at stake, of course.

Vice

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "cost at stake", clearly define what the potential financial loss or risk is. This ensures your audience understands the specific implications being discussed.

Common error

Avoid using "cost at stake" without specifying the nature or scope of the cost. Being vague diminishes the phrase's impact and can confuse the reader.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cost at stake" functions as a noun phrase, typically used to emphasize the financial implications or potential losses associated with a decision, venture, or situation. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "cost at stake" is a grammatically correct and usable expression that highlights potential financial implications or risks. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is suitable for written English. Although it has limited examples, the phrase appears in reputable sources across news, science, and formal business contexts. When using "cost at stake", it is best to specify the potential financial loss or risk to ensure clarity. Alternatives such as "financial risk involved" or "monetary implications" can be used depending on the specific context. While versatile, avoid overgeneralization by always specifying the nature and scope of the cost.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

financial risk involved

Focuses specifically on the element of financial risk.

monetary implications

Highlights the potential financial consequences.

financial burden

Emphasizes the negative impact of the cost.

economic consequences

Broadens the scope to include wider economic effects.

potential expenditure

Focuses on the possibility of spending money.

budgetary impact

Specifies the effect on a budget.

fiscal implications

Highlights the potential effects on fiscal policy or public finance.

investment risk

Specifically relates to the risk associated with an investment.

financial exposure

Highlights the degree to which an entity is subject to financial loss.

commercial jeopardy

Indicates a risk to commercial success or profitability.

FAQs

How can I use "cost at stake" in a sentence?

You can use "cost at stake" to highlight the potential financial implications or risks involved in a particular situation. For example, "The "cost at stake" in this project is significant, requiring careful planning and execution."

What are some alternatives to "cost at stake"?

Alternatives include "financial risk involved", "monetary implications", or "economic consequences", depending on the specific context.

Is "cost at stake" formal or informal?

"Cost at stake" is suitable for both formal and neutral contexts, such as news reporting, business discussions, and academic papers. However, in very informal settings, simpler phrasing may be more appropriate.

What's the difference between "cost at stake" and "amount at stake"?

"Cost at stake" emphasizes the potential financial loss or expenditure, while "amount at stake" focuses on the specific quantity of money or resources that could be lost or gained. The former highlights the implications, and the latter indicates quantity.