corroborated with me

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "corroborated with me" is not correct in standard English usage.
The correct expression would typically be "corroborated by me" or "corroborated with my input." Example: "The witness's account was corroborated by me during the investigation."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

This transmission of trauma has been corroborated with research.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

She is vastly corroborated with her phenomenal memory.

The New York Times

These have been corroborated with conventional analyses.

Microporous and Mesoporous Materials

Numerical results are corroborated with experiments.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Results are corroborated with numerical simulations.

Chemical Engineering Science

Their accounts were corroborated with residents and local government officials.

The Guardian

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products also corroborated with the gene expression studies (Supplementary Fig. 2B).

Nature

These findings were corroborated with 3H-fluconazole sequestration data (Fig. 5b).

Nature

Back trajectory analysis results corroborated with the meteorological observations.

Marine Chemistry

Sometimes the revelation came as the result of a DNA test, which was then corroborated with some genealogical research.

The Guardian

The results corroborated with proteinase activity assays and zymography.

Phytochemistry

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming to express confirmation or support from your perspective, rephrase using constructions like "confirmed by me" or "my analysis supports this" to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "with" after "corroborated" when you mean to indicate who or what is providing the corroboration. Instead, use "by" to correctly show the source of confirmation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "corroborated with me" is grammatically incorrect. The correct usage requires restructuring the sentence or using an alternative phrase. Ludwig AI analysis confirms that this specific construction is not supported by standard English grammar.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "corroborated with me" is grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI analysis indicates, standard English usage requires different phrasing to convey that you are the source of confirmation. Instead, opt for "confirmed by me", "my findings corroborate this", or rephrase the sentence to clearly indicate your role in providing support. By avoiding this error, you ensure clarity and maintain grammatical correctness in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Confirmed by my analysis

Focuses on analytical confirmation instead of direct corroboration.

Verified by my research

Emphasizes research as the method of verification.

My findings support

Shifts the focus to personal findings offering support.

My data validates

Highlights the use of data in validation.

I confirmed through my investigation

Details the action of confirming through personal investigation.

I can attest to

Expresses personal attestation as confirmation.

My experience confirms

Uses personal experience as a basis for confirmation.

I can vouch for

Offers a personal guarantee of truth or accuracy.

My observations corroborate

Focuses on corroboration through direct observation.

My assessment validates

Emphasizes the role of personal assessment in validation.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use the word "corroborate" when I am providing the confirmation?

Instead of saying "corroborated with me", use phrases like "confirmed by me", "my findings corroborate this", or "I can confirm this based on my research".

What can I say instead of "corroborated with me"?

Consider alternatives such as "verified by me", "confirmed by me", or "my analysis supports this" to express that you have provided confirmation.

Is "corroborated with me" grammatically correct?

No, "corroborated with me" is not grammatically correct. The correct usage would typically be "corroborated by me" or a rephrased sentence to indicate that your information supports or confirms something.

What's the difference between "corroborated with me" and "corroborated by me"?

"Corroborated with me" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrase is "corroborated by me", which means that you provided the confirmation. Alternatively, "my findings corroborate this" can be used.