Exact(1)
The corresponding wavelength for the maximum optical extinction cross section is about 715 nm, close to the peak wavelength around 680 nm of the absorption spectrum from the simulation result.
Similar(59)
The corresponding wavelengths for 0% oxygen level were 609.3 nm, 608.5 nm, and 609.7 nm.
We chose them by taking the corresponding wavelength values for the minimum and the maximum of the differential spectra, defining the ratio R for this case as I455 nm/I525 nm (I, fluorescence intensity).
We chose them by taking the corresponding wavelength values for the minimum and the maximum of the differential spectra, defining the ratio R for this case as the ratio between the fluorescence intensities obtained with the excitation wavelength at 455 nm and 525 nm, keeping the emission wavelength constant at 670 nm.
At large wave numbers between 1.8 and 4.4 cycle/km, rishfsi2013, atmPrf2010 and the radiosonde show a large spectral density (i.e., 0.56 0.23 km in the corresponding wavelength) compared to the spectrum for atmPrf2013.
(7) and (8): {text{Color removal efficiency }}left( % right), = frac{{left( {[{text{Abs}}_{i} ]} right) - left( {[{text{Abs}}_{t} ]} right)}}{{{text{Abs}}_{i} }} times 100 (7)where Abs i and Abs t are absorbance of samples at initial and reaction time t for a corresponding wavelength λmax.
An incident beam illuminates the prism at an angle θ =50.15 deg., for bare multilayer (BML), at the corresponding wavelength λ = 1558 nm.
In the echolocation process, pulses will be created by bats which are alive for 8 10 ms at a constant frequency and corresponding wavelength as given in Fig. 1.
The corresponding wavelength is about 510-7 to 310-4 μm.
(1) and (2) and were used to calculate SDS-dependent reflectance at the corresponding wavelength.
From Eq. (5) and assuming similar refractive index for both wavelengths, we see that, in order to have the same velocity range and thus the same flow sensitivity, we need 840 nm/ T840 = 1020 nm/ T1020, where T840 and T1020 are the delay between beams for corresponding wavelengths.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com