corresponding trials for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "corresponding trials for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to trials or experiments that are related or matched to a specific context or set of conditions. Example: "The researchers conducted corresponding trials for each treatment group to ensure accurate comparisons."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The corresponding trials for the controls were selected for analysis (i.e. involving the same limb).

Acta Orthopaedica

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

The strong artifacts obscure the neural information and are likely to render the corresponding trials useless for the following neural information extraction.

BioMed Research International

Very dissimilar definitions, however, were not allowed, leading to the exclusion of the corresponding trial from the meta-analysis for major adverse cardiac events.

British Medical Journal

The drugs were displayed in the same sequence for corresponding trials between the different formats (i.e. the sequence of drugs was the same for Trial 4 as it was for Trial 1).

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

The corresponding trials (i.e., same leg) of the matched healthy subjects were selected for analysis.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

And the physiology data was recorded at the corresponding trials.

BioMed Research International

The trial effect T j was subtracted from the raw data of all entries of the corresponding trial to correct for the differences among the different trials.

BMC Plant Biology

The bottom panel shows the correlation coefficient between the power in each frequency band for each timebin, and the PC2 weight for the corresponding trial.

eLife

The top panel shows the circular-linear correlation (Berens, 2009 ) between the phase of the LFP in each frequency band for each timebin, and the PC2 weight for the corresponding trial.

eLife

If a saccade greater than 1.5° was detected during the presentation of the stimuli, observers received a written feedback about not having preserved fixation, and the data for the corresponding trial were excluded from analysis.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics

Such abrupt transitions are illustrated in Figure 8, which shows simulated single-cell raster activity from different trials (top) and the corresponding trial-averaged activity (bottom; see also Fig. 4 for the population averaged activity).

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "corresponding trials for", ensure that the relationship between the trials is clearly defined and relevant to the context. Specify what makes the trials "corresponding" to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "corresponding trials for" without clearly specifying what the trials correspond to. This can lead to confusion if the reader doesn't understand the basis of the correspondence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "corresponding trials for" functions as a descriptive phrase, modifying a noun (implicitly something being investigated or analyzed) by specifying the nature of the trials involved. As confirmed by Ludwig, it is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

13%

Formal & Business

12%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "corresponding trials for" is a descriptive phrase used to specify trials that are related or matched based on certain criteria. Ludwig confirms that it is grammatically correct and suitable for use in written English, particularly in scientific and academic contexts. While alternatives like "matching trials for" or "related trials for" exist, the choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey. To ensure clarity, always define the basis of the correspondence when using this phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

matching trials for

Replaces "corresponding" with "matching", emphasizing the similarity between the trials.

equivalent trials for

Substitutes "corresponding" with "equivalent", highlighting the equal nature of the trials.

related trials for

Uses "related" instead of "corresponding", focusing on the connection between the trials.

analogous trials for

Replaces "corresponding" with "analogous", suggesting a similarity in function or appearance.

comparable trials for

Emphasizes the ability to compare the trials by using "comparable" instead of "corresponding".

parallel trials for

Uses "parallel" to indicate that the trials are being conducted or analyzed alongside each other.

correlated trials for

Replaces "corresponding" with "correlated", suggesting a statistical relationship between the trials.

trials corresponding to

Inverts the structure to emphasize the trials and their relationship to something else.

the respective trials for

Uses "respective" to emphasize that each trial belongs to a specific item or category.

relevant trials for

Highlights the importance of the trials to a specific context or analysis.

FAQs

How can I use "corresponding trials for" in a sentence?

You can use "corresponding trials for" to refer to trials that are related or matched in some way. For example: "The "matching trials for" the control group were analyzed separately."

What are some alternatives to "corresponding trials for"?

Alternatives include "related trials for", "equivalent trials for", or "matching trials for", depending on the specific meaning you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "corresponding trials for" and "relevant trials for"?

"Corresponding trials for" implies a direct relationship or match between trials, while "relevant trials for" simply means the trials are important or applicable to a particular context. They aren't always interchangeable.

When is it appropriate to use "corresponding trials for" in scientific writing?

It's appropriate when you need to refer to trials that are specifically linked or matched to other trials based on certain criteria, such as patient characteristics, treatment protocols, or experimental conditions.