The phrase "corresponding sentences" is a correctly usable phrase in written English.
For example, "The corresponding sentences in the two documents were surprisingly similar."
It has been supported by both houses of parliament and will allow defendants to be given corresponding sentences up to life imprisonment and death in line with the severity of the offence.
In Latin the two corresponding sentences would be distinguished not by word order, which is grammatically indifferent and largely a matter of style, but by different shapes in the lexical equivalents of dog and cat.
For example, one page showed four different pictures with corresponding sentences: 1.
Hierarchical phrase-based approaches use synchronous grammar rules, which simultaneously expand partial derivations of corresponding sentences in two languages.
(Notice that the dispute between fictionalism and paraphrase nominalism is best understood as a straightforward empirical dispute about the ordinary-language semantics of sentences like (P); the question is whether such utterances literally say the same things that the corresponding sentences like (N) say).
Following this line of thought through, we appear to reach the conclusion that nothing short of full-blown entities like the fact that Socrates is wise will be competent to make the sentence "Socrates is wise", or the Thought or proposition expressed by that sentence, true.[10] The question now is: can we regard such entities as truth-makers for corresponding sentences, Thoughts, or propositions?
'Whom did the dog bite?" (tlįį 'dog' + ma 'whom' + nàghìì'àdla 'he/she/it bit-wh') is related to the sentence Tlįį Alec nàghìì'àdl 'The dog bit Alec.' Note that ma 'whom' in the question occurs in the same position relative to subject and verb as does Alec in the corresponding sentence.
(This idea had in fact been anticipated by the English philosopher Jeremy Bentham [1748 1832].) Frege's theory of sentence meaning explains how it is possible for different people to grasp the same thought such as The North Sea covers an area of 220,000 square miles though no two people associate the corresponding sentence with exactly the same ideas, images, or other mental experiences.
Participants were instructed to watch an action and to generate the corresponding sentence for it.
That context is not a factive context, because it is not the case that it, as well as its internal negation, presuppose the truth of the corresponding sentence.
It helps solve the problem of the unity of the proposition (see the previous section), insofar as the structure of a proposition derives from the syntactic structure of a corresponding sentence.
