Sentence examples for corresponding proposition from inspiring English sources

Especially important in this regard is the notion of an "incomplete symbol", by which Russell understood an expression that can be meaningful in the context of its use within a sentence, but does not by itself correspond to a constituent or unified part of the corresponding proposition.

In a probabilistic theory the limiting cases of a probability equal to 1 or 0 are equivalent to asserting that the corresponding proposition (e.g., "the system has property $P$") is, respectively, true or false.

In Buridanian semantics, such a construction supposits for whatever both the subject and predicate terms of its corresponding proposition supposit for, provided the proposition is true; otherwise it supposits for nothing.

A sentential form, or equivalently the corresponding proposition "in which certain ideas are considered variable", can generate a whole class of propositions if appropriate ideas are substituted for the variable ideas.

From a structured question meaning it is always possible to obtain the corresponding proposition set meaning, by applying B to all the elements of R (and taking the downward closure of the resulting set of propositions in case we want an inquisitive question meaning in the sense of InqB.

As a result, propositional functions (along with their corresponding propositions) will end up being arranged in a hierarchy of the kind Russell proposes.

Thus, propositions of form A imply the corresponding propositions of form I, and those of form E imply those of form O. These last relations were later called subalternation, and the particular propositions (affirmative or negative) were said to be subalternate to the corresponding universal propositions.

The smaller the interval is, the clearer the evidence is to support the corresponding propositions.

Their corresponding propositions are also atomic, both in the sense that they contain no other propositions as parts, and in the sense that the members of any pair of true atomic propositions will be logically independent of one another.

The interval lengths of the third column define a fuzzy truth function for the corresponding propositions on the left side of the logic identities 1-4 in the first column.

The following four propositions corresponding to Propositions 2.1-2.4 arequiredred, and the details are omitted.