corresponding clusters with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "corresponding clusters with" is not correct in English as it lacks clarity and proper grammatical structure.
It can be used when discussing relationships or connections between clusters in a specific context, but it needs to be rephrased for clarity. Example: "The analysis revealed corresponding clusters with similar characteristics in the data set."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

In subsequent steps, the exchange of message is continued to happen between the nodes until a set of exemplars and corresponding clusters with high quality come out.

Algorithms for Molecular Biology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

The k-means clustering is one of the most commonly used method for finding K clusters or codebook in the N observations and each observation belongs to the corresponding cluster with the nearest mean [23].

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Lines with membership probabilities ≥ 0.75 were assigned to corresponding clusters; lines with membership probabilities < 0.75 were assigned to a mixed group.

BMC Plant Biology

Genes were clustered into five corresponding clusters using k-means with a cosangle distance measure, as described above.

BMC Genomics

Each cluster is represented a node, and there exists an edge between two nodes if and only if the two corresponding clusters are in conflict with each other.

Bioinformatics

Here, we cut the dendrogram tree to 50 clusters and the threshold height for this clustering is 7. Supplementary Table  1 (in Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/139254) shows the species name with their corresponding clusters and the pathogenicity of the microorganism species.

BioMed Research International

They found that most of the ground-state structures for neutral and ionic Si n Al (n = 1 20) clusters can be obtained by substituting one Si atom of their corresponding Si clusters with an Al atom.

Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry

Table 6 shows the prediction result of plant-disease relations for all 3 datasets, corresponding to clusters with matching score greater than 0.6.

BioMed Research International

These wind fields are statistically evaluated by weighting them with the corresponding cluster frequency.

Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics

Now consider the right intersection in Figure 6. Figure 7 shows this intersection with the corresponding cluster arrival rates.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Note that in the absence of clustering, the overall network architecture shown in Figure 1(a) collapses into a single cluster and the AP coincides with the corresponding cluster FC.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing clusters, specify the nature of the correspondence to improve clarity. For example, use "clusters with corresponding features" or "clusters with related data" instead of the original phrase.

Common error

Avoid using vague language when describing relationships between clusters. Instead of saying "corresponding clusters with", clarify what aspect corresponds, such as "clusters with corresponding attributes" to avoid confusion.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "corresponding clusters with" attempts to describe a relationship between clusters, but its grammatical structure is flawed. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase lacks clarity, which affects its overall function and precision. It needs further clarification to effectively convey the intended meaning.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "corresponding clusters with" attempts to link different clusters, it suffers from grammatical issues that reduce its clarity. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is not grammatically correct and requires further specification to be effective. To improve usage, consider specifying the attribute that corresponds (e.g., "clusters with corresponding attributes"). The register is typically formal and scientific, but its lack of precision can undermine its credibility in professional settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

clusters with corresponding attributes

Focuses on shared characteristics rather than a general correspondence.

clusters having corresponding features

Highlights specific features that align between clusters.

clusters with matching properties

Emphasizes identical or very similar properties across clusters.

clusters and their corresponding data

Specifies that data is associated with each cluster, giving more context to the association.

clusters with respective characteristics

Indicates that each cluster has its own specific characteristics.

clusters associated with certain traits

Links clusters to specific traits or qualities.

related clusters sharing traits

Highlights the shared traits between the related clusters.

linked clusters displaying attributes

Focuses on the observable attributes displayed by the linked clusters.

interconnected clusters having data

Shows relationship and data sharing among clusters.

correlating clusters exhibiting behaviours

Emphasizes behaviors and correlations between them.

FAQs

How can I phrase "corresponding clusters with" more clearly?

To improve clarity, specify the attribute that corresponds. For example, use phrases like "clusters with "corresponding attributes"" or "clusters with "related data"".

What are some alternatives to "corresponding clusters with" that provide more context?

Consider using phrases such as "clusters sharing "common traits"" or "clusters linked by "similar features"" to offer a clearer understanding of the cluster relationships.

Is "corresponding clusters with" grammatically correct?

The phrase "corresponding clusters with" can be improved by adding a noun after "corresponding" to specify what aspect is corresponding (e.g., "corresponding attributes with"). Without this, it lacks clarity.

When is it appropriate to use "corresponding clusters with"?

It's best to avoid "corresponding clusters with" and instead use more precise language. For instance, use "clusters with corresponding attributes" when discussing shared attributes, or "clusters with respective characteristics" when each cluster has unique characteristics.