Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
corresponded points
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "corresponded points" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be an attempt to refer to points that correspond to each other, but the phrasing is awkward and unclear. Example: "The analysis revealed that the two sets of data had several corresponding points that aligned perfectly."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
Dense surface modelling, described previously (Hutton et al., 2003; Hammond, 2007), uses custom in-house software (ShapeFind; UCL, London, UK) to create a 'dense surface model' of the face by co-registration of landmarked images and the interpolation of densely corresponded points (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
"Corresponding points" refers to two points or particles in the same phase i.e., points that have completed identical fractions of their periodic motion.
Encyclopedias
Corresponding points between this image and (a) are shown by points 1 and 2. Temperature scale is degrees Celsius.
Corresponding points on the real dental cast were also measured directly by using the stylus receiver of the Fastrak.
Corresponding points in each B-scan were aligned from the peak location of a two-dimension Gaussian fit to the raw linear intensity data.
Science
But this resemblance is due to the photographs having been produced under such circumstances that they were physically forced to correspond point by point to nature.
Science
(b) Corresponding points (normal vector in magenta) which obtained the maximum similarity value.
(b) Corresponding points (normal vector in magenta) which obtained the maximum similarity value for the top resolution level.
Element point descriptors correspond to point descriptors based on element atom types; connection number point descriptors correspond to point descriptors based on connection number atom types.
Science
The point corresponded to degree 13.
Science
The mathematical expression corresponded to point C is also given in Eq. (5).
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing relationships between sets of data, use "corresponding points" to clarify that you're referring to points that align between the sets.
Common error
Avoid using the past tense verb form "corresponded" as an adjective. "Corresponding" is the correct adjective to describe points that match or relate to each other.
Source & Trust
76%
Authority and reliability
2.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "corresponded points" is an incorrect adjectival phrase attempting to describe points that share a relationship. As Ludwig AI clarifies, the correct form is using the present participle "corresponding" as an adjective.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "corresponded points" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrase is "corresponding points". As Ludwig AI indicates, using "corresponded" as an adjective is inappropriate. While some instances appear in scientific texts, it's crucial to use the accurate form to maintain credibility. Remember that "corresponding" serves as the adjective, correctly describing points that align or share a relationship. It's more effective to use alternative terms like "matching points" or "related points".
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
corresponding points
Replaces "corresponded" with the correct form "corresponding".
matching points
Uses "matching" to convey the idea of points that align or correspond.
related points
Employs "related" to indicate a connection or association between the points.
aligned points
Focuses on the alignment aspect, suggesting points that are in a specific order or position relative to each other.
associated points
Highlights the association or connection between the points.
interrelated points
Emphasizes the mutual relationship or connection between the points.
connected points
Indicates a direct connection or link between the points.
linked points
Similar to "connected points", but emphasizes the linking aspect.
matching data points
Specifies that the points are data points, providing more context.
correlated points
Uses "correlated" to suggest a statistical relationship between the points.
FAQs
What is the correct way to say "corresponded points"?
The correct way to phrase this is "corresponding points". The word "corresponding" is the present participle form of the verb "correspond" and functions as an adjective.
What does "corresponding points" mean?
"Corresponding points" refers to points in different sets of data that share a relationship or alignment. They are points that match or have similar characteristics.
Can I use "related points" instead of "corresponding points"?
Yes, in some contexts, "related points" can be used as a substitute, although it might not always convey the same precise meaning. "Corresponding points" implies a more direct and specific alignment.
Is "corresponded" ever used correctly as an adjective?
No, "corresponded" is the past tense of the verb "to correspond". The correct adjective form is "corresponding".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
76%
Authority and reliability
2.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested