Because the generalized correlation yields a more general perspective onto the correlated protein motion, it is the one which will be used in the following analyses.
The SLH correlation yielded an average error of 23%.
Among the literature correlations that were used, Glaso (1985) correlation yielded the best results (Table 3).
The correlation yielded a straight line with R2 = 0.90 and 0.86.
Therefore, the residual correlation yields: b = s 1 H C ^ τ s 1 s 2 H C ^ τ s 2 ⋯ s G H C ^ τ s G T (29).
The new developed correlation yielded very good match for the static Young's modulus compared to the measured laboratory core data.
This correlation yields comparatively accurate results for all the fuels at loads greater than 25% of the rated load and at standard fuel injection timing.
The correlation yielded good predictions of the measured data with mean deviations of 3.8 and 6.2% for the inline and staggered tube alignment, respectively.
Moreover, the DP model with the new correlation yielded the mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.5%, 9.1%, 18.8%, 14.2% and 19.8% in prediction of cooling capacity, outlet air temperature, refrigerant superheat, air side and refrigerant side pressure drop, respectively.
Pearson test of correlation yielded a significant correlation between participants' RT and peak latency of parietal N200 activity (r = 0.830, p<0.05).
