Exact(1)
For cirrhotic tissues, Cav-1 expression showed no correlation with etiology or gender (data not shown).
Similar(59)
Examining the previous consideration, the aim of our study was to evaluate the CT findings of IC in correlation with the etiology (O or NOIC etiology) and the different phases of the disease.
Additionally, the obtained results did not show any correlation with the etiology of chronic kidney disease.
This paper aims at evaluating CT findings of occlusive and nonocclusive ischemic colitis (IC), in correlation with the etiology and the different phases of the disease.
Aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of PCT in comparison to white blood cell count (WBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) for clinical outcome and its correlation with microbiological etiology in patients with infective endocarditis (IE).
The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the prognostic value of PCT for clinical outcome including death and serious complications and its correlation with microbiological etiology in patients with IE. We performed a retrospective single-centre study at a German university hospital with large departments of cardiology and cardiac surgery.
Volatile concentrations were examined for correlations with disease etiology.
A strong correlation was found between Cav-1 expression and the presence of venous invasion of HCC samples (p = 0.02), but there was no statistically significant correlation with tumor size, tumor etiology, number of tumor nodules, age and gender (Table 2).
In epidemiology, hot spots are appealing because of their correlation to etiology.
Several aspects of the sponge disease etiology were revealed, particularly the strong correlation with the internal tissue chemistry and environmental temperature.
In conclusion, during partial purification of the collagenase enzyme from the sponge pathogen NW4327, several aspects of the sponge disease etiology were elucidated; namely the strong correlation with the internal tissue chemistry and environmental temperature.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com