Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Comparing the overall results with respect to the number of changes (spots) that were identified in all four studies, it is obvious that there is no correlation (numbers of spots) with WPSS score, as has been pointed out previously [ 9].
Similar(59)
We illustrated the quantity of the various error measures and their dependencies upon haplotype frequency, minor allele frequency, correlation, number of loci and ambiguity in a systematic way.
Hierarchical clustering analysis of allergen-specific IgE was performed in R version 2.5.0 using package pvclust [34] with the following parameters: agglomerative method - average, distance measure - correlation, number of bootstrap replicates - 1000.
Correlation was found to occur between the number of present teeth and BCMI and HGS (positive correlation), number of present teeth and number of prescribed medications (negative correlation), and number of posterior tooth pairs and TUG (negative correlation) (Table 2).
> For each condition of latent correlation, number of items, and variance of the latent variable, we simulated 100,000 twin pairs and correlated their sum scores.
The true coverage of the confidence intervals is in general low and decreases with correlation, number of events and, surprisingly, with sample size.
The attributes include gene expression correlation, number of associated literature citations (PubMed identifiers or PMIDs), local and global network topology, and domain-domain interactions.
We performed an optimization of this filtering approach for a range of values for c and determined its effect on the correlation, number of discarded genes, and number of outliers.
Nevertheless, Figure 3 shows a clear, positive correlation between numbers of citations and accesses.
This current study also indicated a partial correlation of numbers of DF cases significantly precede risks of increasing DF cases of the current month by 1 2 months.
Additionally, we obtained correlations of numbers of diagnostic criteria met between raters and found them satisfactory in all diagnostic categories (Pearson's r =.76 – 1.00).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com