The phrase 'correlated for' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use the phrase when you are making comparisons between two different sets of data. For example, "The data was correlated for accuracy and completeness."
Practice rankings were strongly correlated for antiplatelet prescription (correlation coefficient 0.98) and cholesterol control (0.92) but poorly correlated for blood pressure control (0.39) and smoking cessation (0.22).
"Success and likability are positively correlated for men and negatively correlated for women".
As she writes in the book, "success and likability are positively correlated for men and negatively correlated for women".
For women in the workplace, the problem is, as Ms. Sandberg told me in an interview this week, that "success and likability are positively correlated for men and negatively correlated for women.
Research shows that "likeability" and success are positively correlated for men but negatively correlated for women.
Success and likability are positively correlated for men but negatively correlated for women.
So, in the short term, what about the double bind -- the idea that success and likability are positively correlated for men, yet negatively correlated for women?
Over the past few years, we've been hearing from Sheryl Sandberg about how, "Success and likability are positively correlated for men and negatively correlated for women".
"Success and likeability are positively correlated for men and negatively correlated for women," said Sheryl in her talk, which she later elaborated on in her bestselling book, Lean In.
The variables are positively and negatively correlated for the positive and negative correlation, respectively.
This study shows that health care costs and hospital efficiency are negatively correlated for private hospitals, while they are positively correlated for public hospitals.
