Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
The quizzes not only provided immediate feedback to the trainers if any adjustment of the training was needed, but also served as an avenue for the teams to earn their coins (resources) depending on the correctness of the responses.
The speech was adjusted adaptively, based on the correctness of the responses.
When answering the questions, correctness of the responses and response time were recorded.
Linear regression analysis showed that there was no significant relationship between response time and the correctness of the responses, for either "Mister VCM" or text.
We compared the correctness of the responses, the response time and the satisfaction obtained when general practitioners sought an answer to a medical question in a drug monograph, using either a textual interface or a graphical interface with "Mister VCM".
Correctness of the responses was significantly higher with the graphical interface featuring "Mister VCM" than with the textual interface: 16 errors were recorded with the graphical interface and 27 with the textual one, giving an error ratio of 1.7 in favor of the graphical interface; the difference was significant (p = 0.034).
Similar(54)
The participants received immediate feedback on the correctness of the response via a red box marking the correct picture.
The results of the experiment confirmed the correctness of the response matrix within an overall uncertainty of ±3%.
No feedback about the correctness of the response was given.
No feedback was given as to the correctness of the response; the odor assessment was performed with both participant and researcher blind to condition.
Irrespective of the correctness of the response, Heldmann et al. [31] observed an ERN for items classified as learned before (i.e. YES-responses: hits and false alarms) as compared to items classified as not learned before (i.e. NO-responses: correct rejections and misses).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com