correctly considered

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "correctly considered" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing whether something has been thought about or evaluated in an appropriate or accurate manner. Example: "The proposal was correctly considered by the committee, leading to a unanimous decision."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

17 human-written examples

Only 75% correctly considered themselves overweight, compared with 81% eight years earlier.

The Guardian

Mr Justice Griffith Williams said the mayor had "directed himself correctly, considered all the relevant matters and reached a reasoned decision which cannot be criticised".

The Guardian

But unemployment benefits are correctly considered emergency spending — they are a vital safety net, and the money is crucial to supporting consumer demand in a weak economy — and exempt from pay-as-you-go budget rules.

The New York Times

After a nine-day hearing in London he concluded that the Mayor - in deciding to exclude demonstrators from the historic site - had "directed himself correctly, considered all the relevant matters and reached a reasoned decision which cannot be criticised".

Independent

"The Judicial Panel correctly considered all of the mitigation led on his behalf by PFA Scotland lawyer Liam O'Donnell.

BBC

Therefore, in this model, the uncertainties of wind power and ramp-up/down constrains of traditional power plants are correctly considered in the investment cost.

International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

43 human-written examples

Today's comedians -- from George Carlin to Margaret Cho -- correctly consider Lenny Bruce both path-finder and liberator.

The New York Times

What we now correctly consider sexual harassment was then viewed, by Brown and many others, as a kind of fair-trade agreement.

The New Yorker

The resulting images are realistic, taking into account both the acoustic impedance variations and the shadow effects thanks to the CT images, but did not correctly consider the beamforming issue in transmission and reception.

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

The Integrated lumped parameter model-Computational Fluid Dynamics approach, because of the variable ejector component efficiencies, has been able to correctly consider the off-design performance of an ejector based system; conversely, constant ejector component efficiency models cannot correctly predict the performance of the PEMFC system.

Applied Thermal Engineering

Respondents were asked to rate their confidence to alter the CT parameters correctly, considering image quality and radiation dose (1 = excellent, 5 = poor) and the CSR group recorded a median value of two while the ABR radiologists had a median of three, although this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.716) when examined using the Mann–Whitney U test.

Insights into Imaging

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "correctly considered", ensure that the context clearly indicates who did the considering and what criteria were used to deem it 'correct'. This adds clarity and strengthens your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "correctly considered" when the act of considering is inherently subjective or based on personal opinion. Reserve it for situations where objective criteria or established standards apply.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "correctly considered" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that someone or something has been evaluated or judged accurately. As confirmed by Ludwig, it's a valid and commonly used expression. Examples in Ludwig demonstrate its use in both formal and scientific contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "correctly considered" is a versatile and grammatically sound expression, suitable for conveying the accuracy and validity of an evaluation or judgment. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's widely used across various contexts, particularly in scientific and news-related domains. While alternatives like ""properly evaluated"" or ""accurately assessed"" offer subtle nuances, "correctly considered" remains a reliable choice for emphasizing the precision and thoroughness of a deliberation. When using this phrase, ensure the context clearly indicates who performed the evaluation and the criteria used to deem it 'correct' for maximum impact. Avoid overuse in purely subjective contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

exactly considered

Emphasis on the precision and accuracy of the consideration.

rightfully considered

Highlights the justification and fairness in the consideration.

properly considered

Focuses on the appropriateness and adherence to standards in the consideration.

aptly considered

Suggests that the consideration was particularly fitting or suitable.

rightly considered

Similar to "rightfully considered", indicating moral or ethical correctness.

accurately assessed

Replaces consideration with assessment, emphasizing the correctness of the evaluation.

suitably evaluated

Focuses on the fitness and quality of the evaluation.

appropriately judged

Highlights the fairness and validity of the judgment.

well-judged

Emphasizes the quality and thoughtfulness of a decision.

thoughtfully evaluated

Highlights the thoroughness and care taken in the evaluation.

FAQs

How can I use "correctly considered" in a sentence?

You can use "correctly considered" to describe a situation where something has been evaluated or judged accurately, such as "The proposal was "carefully considered" and ultimately approved".

What are some alternatives to "correctly considered"?

Alternatives to "correctly considered" include "properly evaluated", "accurately assessed", or "appropriately judged", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it always necessary to specify who "correctly considered" something?

While not always grammatically required, specifying who did the considering often adds clarity and strengthens the impact of your statement. For example, "The experts "thoroughly evaluated" the data" is more informative than "The data was correctly considered".

What's the difference between "correctly considered" and "well considered"?

"Correctly considered" implies accuracy and adherence to specific criteria, while "well considered" suggests thoughtfulness and thoroughness. Something can be well considered but still lead to an incorrect conclusion, whereas something correctly considered should ideally lead to an accurate one.