Sentence examples for correctly accepted from inspiring English sources

With incorrect authorization, the commands cannot be executed by the TPM chip nor the output be correctly accepted.

As predicted by the derivations, all three metrics (K i, MRgluc, and M R gluc max ) correctly accepted the null hypothesis at baseline in the 42 comparisons of the control with treatment groups in the full experimental data (Table  2).

The large part of the AC-IE editorial decisions (70%) could be classified as either correctly accepted (later highly cited) or correctly rejected (later low citation counts).

Taylor and Russell [13] provided eleven tables from which, based on the given base rate, selection rate, and validity coefficient, the percentage of correctly accepted submissions (AQ/(AQ+AN)) can be taken.

According to the corresponding Taylor-Russell table, with a base rate of 80%, a selection rate of 30%, and a validity coefficient of rxy = .5, 94% of submissions accepted for publication are correctly accepted.

For instance, with base and selection rates of 50% and a validity coefficient of rxy = .5 (see graph B in Figure 1), as the Taylor-Russell table shows, 67% of the submissions accepted for publication are correctly accepted (that is, they are qualified submissions).

(An unexpected offer!) Qxc2! (Correctly accepting the proffered booty).

The crucial issue though was that the sensor itself seemed awfully finicky and wouldn't always correctly accept a user's finger inputs.

The judgement "If A exists, then B does not exist" might then be analysed as "It is impossible correctly both to accept A and to reject B", which can be expressed in existential form as "Someone who can correctly accept A and reject B does not exist".

However, as expected, the bilinguals were slightly slower and less accurate than the monolingual English participants for both correctly accepting words (t41 = −2.93, P < 0.05 for RTs; t40.56 = 4.84, P < 0.05 for accuracy) and for correctly rejecting nonwords [ t39.03 = −4.63, P < 0.05 for RTs; t40.42 = 3.86, P < 0.05 for accuracy].

This "quality and quantity" factor, called VGoS-factor, can provide a combination of blocking and dropping rate with the average normalized MOS in the hotspot: the first two serving as quantitative metrics of the system's capacity to accept new calls and finalize correctly the accepted ones, while the third one as a speech quality metric.