Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
corrections were tested
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "corrections were tested" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the evaluation or validation of changes made to a document, process, or system. Example: "After implementing the changes, the corrections were tested to ensure they resolved the issues identified in the initial review."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Academia
News & Media
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
Two postreconstruction PVE corrections were tested.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
The effect of the corrections was tested with Hybrid Recon OSEM3D and MAPMRP with 6 iterations and 16 subsets in the second experiment.
Science
For the exam corrections, the change in assessment scores when compared with no corrections was tested for significance using a one- or two-sample t test.
Science
Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and linkage disequilibrium using Bonferroni correction were tested for every locus.
The statistical significance of the linear and quadratic regression coefficients of the threshold model age correction were tested.
Additionally a statistical procedure not based on a matching day by day correction is tested.
Science
The causal contribution of these areas to online correction was tested in subsequent neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) experiments.
Science
The significance of reductions in gamma with artefact correction was tested, across subjects, for each cohort separately, using one-tailed t tests.
Science
Of the proposed corrections, 25 were tested and confirmed by resequencing.
Academia
All the available correction models were tested, but the complex ones were outperformed by the simple correction models.
Science
All the available correction models were tested, but the complex models were outperformed by the simple correction models.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing the validation process, specify the testing methods or criteria used to evaluate the "corrections were tested" to add credibility and clarity.
Common error
Avoid vague statements about testing "corrections were tested". Provide specific details about what corrections were made and how they were evaluated to demonstrate a thorough and rigorous process.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "corrections were tested" functions as a declarative statement indicating that certain changes or fixes have been subjected to a process of evaluation or validation. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.
Frequent in
Science
50%
Academia
30%
News & Media
20%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "corrections were tested" is a grammatically correct and usable statement, as confirmed by Ludwig AI, indicating that changes have undergone a validation process. Predominantly used in scientific and academic contexts, it conveys that adjustments or fixes have been evaluated for their effectiveness. While uncommon, this phrase effectively communicates that implemented changes have been rigorously assessed, emphasizing the reliability of the modifications. Alternative phrases, such as "revisions were validated" or "adjustments were verified", can be used to convey similar meanings with slight variations in emphasis. When employing this phrase, specify the testing methods to enhance clarity and credibility. Overall, "corrections were tested" serves as a concise and neutral way to demonstrate that changes have been thoroughly evaluated.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
Revisions were validated
Replaces 'corrections' with 'revisions', emphasizing the act of validating changes made.
Adjustments were verified
Substitutes 'corrections' with 'adjustments', focusing on the verification of modifications.
Amendments were assessed
Uses 'amendments' instead of 'corrections', highlighting the assessment of improvements made.
Modifications underwent testing
Rephrases the sentence structure to emphasize the testing process applied to modifications.
Changes were evaluated
Replaces 'corrections' with 'changes', focusing on the evaluation of alterations.
Rectifications were examined
Substitutes 'corrections' with 'rectifications', highlighting the examination of remedies.
Improvements were checked
Uses 'improvements' instead of 'corrections', focusing on the verification of positive changes.
Hypotheses were verified
Shifts the focus to the verification of hypotheses, implying that corrections stemmed from hypothesis testing.
Errors were validated
Focuses on validating the identification and resolution of errors.
Defects were checked
Highlights the checking of defects, implying that corrections addressed those defects.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "corrections were tested" to sound more formal?
For a more formal tone, you can use alternatives like "revisions were validated", "adjustments were verified", or "amendments were assessed" depending on the specific context and the nature of the corrections made.
What does it mean when someone says "corrections were tested"?
It means that changes or fixes (corrections) have been implemented and then evaluated or verified to ensure they are effective and achieve the intended outcome. This often involves a systematic process of testing and validation.
Is it redundant to say "corrections were tested"? Can't we just say "corrections were made"?
Saying "corrections were made" simply indicates that changes were implemented. Saying "corrections were tested" implies that those changes underwent a process of evaluation to confirm their effectiveness. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize the validation step.
What's the difference between "corrections were made" and "corrections were tested"?
"Corrections were made" indicates that changes have been implemented. "Corrections were tested" indicates that those changes have been evaluated to ensure they are effective and meet the desired outcome. The second includes a validation step.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested