Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
correction were done
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "correction were done" is not correct in English.
It should be "corrections were done." You can use the corrected phrase when referring to the completion of changes or adjustments made to something, such as a document or a project. Example: "After reviewing the report, I can confirm that all necessary corrections were done before submission."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
4 human-written examples
Normalization and background correction were done by RMA.
Science
Phasing and baseline correction were done automatically by the software and adjusted by a human profiler.
Science
Quantification and background correction were done using Image Quant 5.2 software.
Science
Image quantification and signal correction were done as previously described [ 23].
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
56 human-written examples
The ankle correction was done acutely, while the knee deformity was corrected progressively (Fig. 2).
The window will shut completely before the correction is done".
News & Media
This correction is done on the ground.
Science
The lithology correction was done using the cross-plot.
Error correction is done by creating a slight delay between the transmitter and Wireless Speaker.
News & Media
Acute correction at the supramalleolar osteotomy, while progressive correction was done at the proximal tibial corticotomy.
The baseline correction was done using a calibrated sample of barium sulfate as reference.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use the grammatically correct form "corrections were done" when referring to multiple corrections. A better way to say it is "corrections were made" or "corrections were completed".
Common error
Avoid using "correction were done". Remember that "correction" is singular, so it would require "was" instead of "were". However, the sentence would still sound unnatural. Opt for "corrections were made" instead.
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "correction were done" functions as a statement indicating that some form of amends or fixes have been carried out. However, as Ludwig AI points out, the phrase is grammatically incorrect because it features a mismatch in subject-verb agreement. The noun 'correction' should agree with 'was' not 'were'.
Frequent in
Science
75%
News & Media
25%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "correction were done" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided. Ludwig AI reports it is more appropriate to use "corrections were made" or "corrections were completed" instead. While the phrase appears in some scientific and news-related contexts, its incorrect grammar diminishes its suitability for formal usage. Remember to use "corrections were made" as a grammatically sound alternative in both formal and informal contexts. Correct grammar ensures clarity and professionalism in your writing. It's important to ensure subject-verb agreement to maintain accuracy. The correct grammar makes the text sound natural.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
corrections were made
Replaces "done" with "made", which is a more grammatically standard construction.
corrections have been made
Uses the present perfect tense to emphasize the completion of the corrections.
corrections have been completed
Emphasizes the completion aspect with the verb "completed".
the corrections were implemented
Focuses on the implementation of the corrections.
the corrections were carried out
Uses "carried out" as a more formal alternative to "done".
the necessary corrections were executed
Emphasizes the execution aspect, implying precision.
the required adjustments were performed
Substitutes "corrections" with "adjustments" and "done" with "performed".
the revisions were finalized
Replaces "corrections" with "revisions", highlighting the finalization stage.
the modifications were applied
Focuses on the application of the modifications.
the errors were rectified
Highlights the act of rectifying or correcting errors, taking more distance from the original query and focusing on the error removing action.
FAQs
What is the correct way to say "correction were done"?
The grammatically correct way to express this idea is to use plural form and say "corrections were made" or "corrections were completed".
Is "correction was done" grammatically correct?
While "correction was done" is grammatically correct, it sounds unnatural. It's better to say "a correction was made" or "the correction was performed".
What are some alternatives to "corrections were done" in formal writing?
In formal writing, you can use phrases like "the corrections were implemented", "the revisions were finalized" or "the modifications were applied".
What's the difference between "corrections were done" and "corrections were made"?
While both phrases aim to convey that corrections have been carried out, "corrections were made" is more grammatically accepted and commonly used. "Correction were done" is considered incorrect.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested