Exact(9)
For the first repetition of the list of scenes only, incorrect responses were followed by a correction trial in which the scene was re-presented with only the correct object present.
If she made a second error, only the target stimulus appeared on the screen during a second correction trial.
If the chimpanzee made an error, only the positive face with positive eyes appeared as a target in the next correction trial, irrespective of whether it was a baseline or test trial.
A correction trial consisted of the re-presentation of the same scene with only the correct foreground object in it.
A correction trial was presented after any error in the first block of trials in each session, that is, the first run through the list of scenes.
If the final trial was incorrect, a correction trial was given so that the monkey only ever received the large food reward following a correct response.
Similar(51)
If the chimpanzee touched a distractor, all stimuli disappeared, a 0.5-s buzzer was sounded, and the same trial was presented again until the correct choice was provided (correction trials).
The CogLab program (see above) automatically logged date and time during the experiments and counted the correct first choices per session and the correction trials (the number of errors per trial).
Lifting the unrewarded stimulus was considered an error, but the trial continued, similarly to the correction trials of the touchscreen task, until the correct stimulus was turned and the reward was retrieved.
Given our findings and the conflicting results for TH and Se correction trials in critically ill patients, it might be advantageous to correct T3 status and Se deficiency in parallel to interrupt the self-amplifying pathogenic mechanism aggravating the disease and all too often causing a deadly outcome (Fig. 5).
To prevent the subjects from developing side preferences, correction trials (CT) were provided after each incorrect choice until the correct stimulus was pecked.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com