Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
In addition, we corrected the label on the right y-axis on Figure 7A.
Similar(59)
In Figure 2, we stimulated the cells with a combination of Sema3A and 3F (we corrected the labeling in the revised manuscript).
We have corrected the labeling in the legend for Figure 6A, and also made the labeling in Figures 6D and 6E consistent.
A domain expert manually reviewed and corrected the labels predicted by the classifier; the domain expert annotations served as the gold standard.
We have corrected the labelling of the haemoglobin β-subunit helices, with helices C and F indicated as those that contact the receptor.
We initially experimented with a pre-tagging strategy using a specially adapted version of the MyMiner system [42] that included the option of pre-tagging the text with Oscar4 and then manually correcting the labels.
Second, although the labeling of GSH gave good yield (70% decay corrected), the yield in labeling larger biomolecules such as 5′-S-ODN (5% decay corrected) was low.
Once this fraction-specific is known, it is straightforward to correct the initial labeling distribution to yield a specific labeling distribution profile.
We noticed our error after the proof stage and corrected the figure, and the revised labeling now appears in the figure.
The SA was calculated by the initial SA (712 MBq/nmol) corrected by the labelling efficiency.
This means in a binary classification that a single label prediction is correct if the label is the correct one, a dual label is always correct, and an empty prediction is always incorrect.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com