Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
When verifying their decision, participants corrected an average of.16 mistakes per ECG (SD = .50).50
Similar(59)
In the present study, the overjet was corrected by an average of 3.9 mm.
The molar relationship was corrected by an average of 3.7 mm.
The map after IHRSR was corrected by an average CTF envelope calculated from the CTF parameters for all images used in the final map calculation.
The augmentation index, an estimate of systemic arterial stiffness, was calculated as the difference between the second systolic peak and inflection point, expressed as a percentage of the central pulse pressure corrected to an average heart rate of 75 bpm.
A SDD (= SEM × 1.96 × √2) of approximately 49 Nm from knee extension was calculated from their study results (ICC.87, Sd 14.5 Nm, strength value originally expressed in Kg, converted to Nm and corrected to an average lever arm of 34 cm, which was the average 80% shank length of the included and excluded participants in our study, (see table 2) [ 16].
Augmentation index, an estimate of systemic arterial stiffness was calculated as the difference between the second systolic peak and inflection point, expressed as a percentage of the central pulse pressure corrected to an average heart rate of 75 beats per minute.
From the study of Taylor et al. [ 31] among patients with cerebral palsy, we were able to calculate a SDD of approximately 43 Nm (ICC.81, Sd 10.7, strength value originally expressed in Kg, converted to N and corrected to an average lever arm of 34 cm for Nm).
Based on facial attributes alone, participants were able to pick out tops an average of 64.56percentt of the time, but bottoms only 38.82 percent of the time (overall guesses were correct an average of 51.69percentt of the time).
If the hypothesis is correct, an average fitness of mutagenized population normalized by the average fitness of the original population should be higher for organisms with larger genomes.
For 5 8 classrooms, students averaged 27% correct to 93% correct with an average of 60%.
More suggestions(4)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com