Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(19)
The observed agreement rate was 0.87 and the chance corrected agreement rate Kappa was 0.77, again a good strength of agreement [9].
The observed agreement rate was 0.91 and the chance corrected agreement rate Kappa was 0.74, i.e., a good strength of agreement.
Chance corrected agreement (kappa statistic) on rejection among reviewers was 0.11 (p<.0.11
Cohen's chance corrected agreement was 0.3.
Chance corrected agreement between reviewers was assessed with Cohen's κ.
The corrected agreement values are also shown in Table 5.
Similar(41)
Overall agreement in the designation of outlier hospitals between in-hospital and 30-day RSMRs was 78%, but chance-corrected agreement was only fair (κ=0.29).
We calculated chance-corrected agreement, using the kappa statistic [57], [65].
The within-group chance-corrected agreement (A), defined as 1- δ/E, has a maximum of 1 when there is no dissimilarity between the elements of any group.
For comparisons of rating the methodological quality we calculated chance-corrected agreement (using kappa) and chance-independent agreement (using Φ) [52], [55], [56].
The within-group chance-corrected agreement (A), defined as 1-δ/E, has a maximum value of 1 when there is no dissimilarity among elements of any groups.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com