Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(9)
To test whether rats selected the correct sand cup based on its spatial association with the landmark, as opposed to other cues, two probe sessions were run.
When rats dug the correct sand well, rats were allowed to retrieve one of the three buried pellets at a time, and they brought one back to the start box to eat it.
Rats were required to find a sand well that contains three reward pellets (correct sand well, hereafter), while the other five sand wells contained no reward (incorrect sand wells, hereafter) in a trial.
Rats are known to have a strong preference to dig the previous correct sand well during the several sessions from the beginning of the paired-associate learning test using the event arena (Tse et al. 2007).
(3) The index of "memory in days": a probability to dig first the correct sand well in the last, or sixth, trial of the previous day (session) in the initial foraging in trial 1 through sessions 2 7.
Therefore, rats had to learn the unique six flavor-location pairs to effectively find the correct sand well, obtain reward (correct choice, hereafter), and avoid digging the sand wells that contained no reward before making a correct choice (incorrect choice, hereafter) (Fig. 1b).
Similar(51)
The amount of water-stable aggregates was corrected for sand content and reported as macro- and micro-aggregates.
And before anyone corrects my sand math, let me freely acknowledge it's a calculation with such a large margin of error that the answer is almost meaningless — which isn't a bad analogy for all the debates that occur over the federal budget.
Put in the correct amount of sand and gravel and stir with a short shovel or spade.
However, is this assumption correct for all beach sand?
If Dr. Sands is correct about the importance of bacteria, there would be implications for destruction of vegetation through overgrazing or logging, which might decrease the presence of bacteria and contribute to droughts.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com