Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(15)
While we don't yet know whether that explanation is correct, it does sound plausible to experts on missile technology, who say the systems that were involved create ample opportunities for planes to be misidentified.
And, more subtly, even if anecdote is correct, it does not answer the question of whether power tends to corrupt, as Lord Acton's dictum has it, or whether it merely attracts the corruptible.
But if the scientists' analysis of the crystal's age is correct, "it does challenge the view there was widespread magma ocean on the surface" at the time the crystal was formed, said Dr. T. Mark Harrison, a professor of geochemistry at the University of California at Los Angeles and an author of the second Nature paper.
However, even if this is correct, it does not answer a further potential challenge.
However, even if this is correct, it does not follow that they cannot share the same phenomenal character.
While both its advocates and those who argued strenuously against it would likely find themselves somewhat disoriented if this were correct, it does seem that non-cognitivists would be most upset by this result.
Similar(45)
MCCABE: That's correct, it did not.
This claim is not correct; it did not originate from a blogger.
But when he revised it to "make it correct, it didn't sound like my voice or say what I wanted to say".
The implementation time is not a good measure to compare models since construct a model fast does not mean that it is correct and it does what it is supposed to do.
His sentiment is correct, but it doesn't give you license to be a jerk.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com