Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
However, few people knew the correct fish advisories.
Similar(55)
Recent works in the single-phenomenon category include books on bananas, fracking, cod (that's correct, the fish), the Treaty of Versailles, pepper, the color mauve, and (hmm) the color indigo.
If Martin's analysis is correct, the fish has evolved these traits all within the last thousand years or less remarkably quickly on an evolutionary timescale.
Residuals of spleen weight (corrected for fish body weight) was negatively correlated with residuals of gonad weight (corrected for fish body weight) in females but not in males (p > 0.05).
Therefore, to correct the fish-oil properties, a new environmentally friendly heterogeneous superacid catalyst (SO42−/SnO2-ZrO2 SO42−/SnO2-ZrO2the esterification reaction of FFA wash etested.
It is important to keep in mind that snake strikes are ballistic and cannot be corrected for fish movement.
Because the structural components of the anterior jaw are highly correlated with body size [[ 26], NFP unpublished] each 4-bar link was corrected for fish standard length (SL) prior to correlation.
A positive but not significant relationship between ectoparasite abundance and spleen weight (p = 0.11) and a negative relationship between ectoparasite abundance and gonad weight corrected for fish body weight was found (N = 10, b = -0.93, R2 = 0.36, p = 0.0496).
Moreover, there was a trend of difference in spleen weight corrected for fish weight (KW test, p = 0.07) when comparing females and males with the males having the larger spleen.
We reported no difference in the accuracy (proportion of correct choices) between fish trained with 8 (mean ± std. dev.: 0.753±0.556) and those trained with 4 figures as positive (0.796±0.071; independent t-test t 8) = −1.06, p = 0.319).
We reported no difference in the proportion of correct choices between fish trained with three (mean±std. dev.: 0.753±0.065) and those trained with two figures (0.678±0.028; t(7) = 2.337, p = 0.052).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com