In a widely read post on an industry blog, the playwright Ming Peiffer wrote, "Why must we once again go through the panoply of politically correct racial discourse to explain why [INSERT OUTDATED ASIAN MUSICAL HERE] is offensive.
This stems from his reflection on the word "correct" in aesthetic discourse, and he mentions the case of being drilled in harmony and counterpoint.
He has stressed that Egypt is committed to "correcting the religious discourse" and freeing it from extremism.
It was striking, I sighed, to hear such a statement, with its phrasing reminiscent of an E! News brief on the dating life of Justin Bieber, in this context, as a correct subtheme of national discourse.
For, as we have just seen, the argument against perdurance theory outlined at the end of the last section depends on the correct interpretation of modal discourse.
Unlike paraphrase nominalists, fictionalists admit that the platonist's face-value semantics for mathematical discourse is correct; but because fictionalists don't believe in abstract objects, they think that mathematical sentences like '3 is prime' are not true.
In short, when people say things like '3 is prime', they do not usually have any intention to be saying anything other than what the these sentences seem to say; and because of this, it seems that the platonist's face-value semantics for mathematical discourse is correct.
More specifically, they're supposed to show that the psychologistic semantics of mathematical discourse is not correct because it has consequences that fly in the face of the actual usage of mathematical language.
In the interests of truth and civil discourse, let me correct and disprove these lies once and for all.
The false population decline must be corrected before it further sours communal discourse.
