corps to work

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "corps to work" is not correct in English and does not convey a clear meaning.
It seems to be an incomplete or incorrect expression, and without additional context, it is difficult to determine its intended use. Example: "The corps to work on the project was assembled last week."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

One of the few candidates with an arts platform, he called for a young "artist corps" to work in low-income schools and neighborhoods; affordable health care and tax benefits for artists; and efforts at cultural diplomacy, like dispatching artist-ambassadors to other countries.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

City Year (on whose board I serve) provides "near-peer" corps members to work in schools with dropout prone youth; many corps members go on to become teachers.

Huffington Post

But the bullpen is, and after Nova left in the seventh, the relief corps went to work.

The New York Times - Sports

There wa a discussion about unemployment it was suggested that a youth corps be formed to work on public-works projects.

The New Yorker

Last year, Dr. Lu, who left the NASA astronaut corps in 2007 to work for Google, joined with veterans of the space program and Silicon Valley entrepreneurs to accelerate the asteroid hunt.

The New York Times - Science

In response to Betsy, Congress directed the Corps of Engineers to work in consultation with the local Sewage and Water Board (SWB) and the Orleans Levee Board (OLB) to examine alternatives for providing hurricane protection at the outfall drainage canals.

Huffington Post

And they have pushed for the creation of what their campaign labelled a "green jobs corps", putting young people to work on environmental projects.

The Guardian - Opinion

Talk story about Wendy Kopp, who has been a media favorite ever since she burst on the scene in 1989, when, as a 21-year-old Princeton senior, she used her thesis to plan a national teacher corps and then set to work to bring a version of it to life.

The New Yorker

By Jesse Kornbluth The New Yorker, October 17 , 1994P. 46 Talk story about Wendy Kopp, who has been a media favorite ever since she burst on the scene in 1989, when, as a 21-year-old Princeton senior, she used her thesis to plan a national teacher corps and then set to work to bring a version of it to life.

The New Yorker

A Digital Teacher Corps should be established to work in the lowest-performing elementary schools in order to train teachers to help students learn to read by transforming information for discovery and problem-solving.

Huffington Post

CongresswomAnotherlyn B. Maloney reproposal parts of Queens and Manhattan in the U.S. House of Representatives where she is the Chair of the Joint Economic Committee.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to a specific group undertaking a task, ensure the phrase is clear and grammatically sound. Consider using more common terms like "team", "group", or "unit" depending on the context.

Common error

The phrase "corps to work" can be unclear. Instead of saying "The corps to work on the project…", specify the team or group: "The team designated to work on the project…" is more precise.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "corps to work" functions as a nominal phrase attempting to describe a group intended for a specific purpose. However, Ludwig AI indicates this construction is grammatically incorrect. A clearer phrasing would specify the corps's action, such as "corps assigned to work."

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "corps to work" is grammatically questionable and lacks clear meaning in standard English. Ludwig AI identifies it as not being correct. While examples exist in some news sources, it's advisable to use more precise alternatives like "team assigned to work" or "group designated to work" to avoid ambiguity. The phrase's intended purpose is to describe a group intended to carry out a specific task, but its grammatical shortcomings undermine its effectiveness. For clearer communication, especially in professional contexts, consider using the recommended alternatives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

team assigned to work

Replaces "corps" with "team" and clarifies the assignment.

group designated to work

Substitutes "corps" with "group" and specifies the designation.

unit tasked with working

Uses "unit" instead of "corps" and emphasizes the assigned task.

squad detailed to work

Replaces "corps" with "squad" and highlights the detailing of personnel.

task force responsible for working

Substitutes "corps" with "task force" and stresses responsibility.

personnel committed to work

Uses "personnel" instead of "corps" emphasizing commitment.

staff allocated to work

Replaces "corps" with "staff" highlighting resource allocation.

division assigned to the task

Substitutes "corps" with "division" and clarifies the task at hand.

crew delegated to work

Uses "crew" instead of "corps" emphasizing delegation.

force deployed for work

Replaces "corps" with "force" and highlights deployment.

FAQs

What does "corps to work" mean?

The phrase "corps to work" is grammatically incorrect and doesn't have a clear standard meaning. It's likely an incomplete or non-idiomatic expression. Consider using phrases like "team assigned to work" or "group designated to work" for clarity.

How can I use "team assigned to work" in a sentence?

You can use the phrase like this: "The "team assigned to work" on the project met its deadline." It clearly indicates a group responsible for a task.

What are some alternatives to "corps to work"?

Alternatives include "group designated to work", "unit tasked with working", or "task force responsible for working". These options provide better clarity and grammatical correctness.

Is "corps to work" grammatically correct?

No, "corps to work" is not grammatically correct in standard English. It lacks a clear subject-verb relationship. It's better to rephrase it to something like "a corps assigned to work" or "a team to work with".