"The Supreme Court majority has acted recklessly to free up corporations to use their immense, aggregate corporate wealth to flood federal elections and buy government influence.
Or, as Ms. Kagan characterized the argument in her article, that regulation is permissible "on the ground that corporate wealth derives from privileges bestowed on corporations by the government".
But by agreeing to pay reparations, corporations like DaimlerChrysler, Deutsche Bank, Siemens and Volkswagen are tacitly admitting that German corporate wealth rests at least partly on slave labor extracted from Jews during the commission of crimes against humanity.
Call it a corporate wealth effect.
They represent business and corporate wealth and greed and guns.
Theirs is an argument of efficiency, but also of a reshuffling of corporate wealth.
We can't effectively compete with corporate wealth, so we don't spend a single dollar of members' money on political activity.
Indeed, the tax gives job creators an extra reason to make sure that corporate wealth does in fact trickle down.
Studies regularly claim that the use of Twitter, Facebook and other such services poses a threat to corporate wealth.
They unashamedly exploited locals, of course, as they amassed corporate wealth, a process now known as "outsourcing".
It is a striking juxtaposition of corporate wealth and success in a city that cannot provide adequate police protection or keep the streetlights on.
