Suggestions(3)
Exact(6)
Increasing the corrugation angle and the core sheet thickness improved the specific bending strength of the sandwich structure, while increasing the bond length led to a reduction in the specific bending strength.
The WWE domain appears to have acquired an additional strand after the terminal strand which is inserted in the middle of the core sheet.
The acquisition of this additional strand has resulted in the emergence of a connector arm that joins it to the terminal conserved strand of the core sheet.
The 5-stranded assemblage is unified by the addition of the fifth strand to the core sheet and the consequent emergence of the "connector arm" linking the additional strand to the terminal strand.
The class-I AAtRSs and HIGH-motif NTases belong to the HUP (HIGH, UspA, Photolyase/PP-loop) superclass of Rossmannoid domains that, just as predicted for the CDPSs, contain a core sheet with 5 strands [ 13].
However, the apparent rarity of the simple 4-stranded versions suggests that there appears to be a tendency to elaborate the core sheet to provide an increased interface for interactions.
Similar(54)
In addition, the interaction properties of the composite and the foam core sheets during the loadings were discussed.
The peak stresses locate at the connections between the facesheets and core sheets, and illustrate the failure mechanism of the experimentally observed failure models.
The discrete geometric nature of the core is taken into account by treating the core sheets as beams and the sandwich panel as composite structure of plates and beams with proper displacement compatibility.
One surface of the core sheets is partially obscured by helical segments in both these folds, whereas the other is largely left exposed (see SCOP database [ 7]).
Key design parameters that were considered include fibre type, corrugation angle, core-sheet thickness, bond length between core and face-sheets, and foam inserts.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com