Ash fraction of L4 trabecular bone cores did not differ between groups.
In addition, the core temperatures immediately after admission to the SICU (36.75 ± 0.13 vs 36.22 ± 0.3°C, respectively) and at one hr (36.95 ± 0.13 vs 36.46 ± 0.2°C, respectively) were significantly higher in the water warmer group, compared to the control group, whereas the core temperature did not differ significantly afte two hours in ICU in both groups.
The remaining eight core elements, which did not differ significantly in copy number between B6 and BLG2 or between B6 and MSM, should not be considered as CNV-type.
Critically, one-sample t tests confirmed that both sham, t(17) = 6.26, p <.001, and shell-injected groups, t(14) = 6.9, p <.001, readily solved the discrimination at test (scores above 0.5), but performance in the core-injected group did not differ statistically from chance (t < 1). Figure 3 (top half) displays the relationship between DA levels in each accumbal subregion and task performance.
For all cases in PUM-TMA, the percentage of nBAP1-positive tumour cells in the individual cores of each UM did not differ by more than 10%, indicating no significant heterogeneity in the presence or absence of nBAP1 protein expression across any individual tumour.
The reporting of the core components of the sample size determination did not differ noticeably between studies with commercial and non-commercial sponsors (fig 4 and supplementary table 12).
None of the markers showed significant differences between samples A and B. Similarly, Ki67, ER, PgR and HER2 did not differ significantly between core-cuts and main resection specimen, although there was a trend for lower resection values for ER (P = 0.06).
Furthermore, control 5 p:1 p ratio did not differ among diet groups in NAc core (Supplementary Fig. 3d) or CPu (not illustrated), implying that diet does not alter nAChR-dependent DA release regulation.
