Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "copyright for" is not correct.
The correct phrase is "copyright of." You can use this phrase when referring to the copyright ownership of something, like a book, song, or artwork. For example: "This song is under the copyright of John Smith."
Exact(59)
What is copyright for?
The Times has violated freelancers' copyright for years.
Set up workshops on copyright for staff and students.
Because what if someday Congress succeeds in reconceiving copyright for the digital age?
The copyright for composition is chartered at the federal level, and is well settled.
In 1972, an act brought copyright for new sound recordings under federal jurisdiction.
They stipulated that the copyright for the record lasts 88 years.
Compared with copyright for art or literature, the AWCPA is a recent development.
If I take a photograph of an item, I hold the copyright for that.
The limited copyright for "Gone with the Wind" expired in 1992.
Music publishers control the copyright for the music and lyrics to songs, as opposed to their recordings.
More suggestions(6)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com