Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(3)
Copulation success in each generation and crossing experiment depends on the differences in wing sizes of the mating partners.
Copulation success in the light was not affected by knockdown of FruC in TH+ neurons but was moderately reduced upon knockdown of FruC in pox9-1-6+ neurons.
We found that removing FruC in P1 by expressing fruC- shmiR under the NP2631 driver was sufficient to inhibit courtship in the dark but did not affect copulation success in the light.
Similar(57)
show that isoform-mutant flies exhibit defects in male courtship, copulation success, and song production.
In Barbary macaques, such playback experiments have revealed that male listeners are sensitive to variation in relation to copulation success (Pfefferle et al. 2008a).
The failure of mutant animals to ovulate was not due to defects in mating, as both mutant and control females showed similar rates of copulation success (indicated by the presence of sperm in the female reproductive tract).
Particularly in regards to pregnancy and copulation success, is RFRP acting on mating neural circuits?
While this may contribute to low copulation success of TNT/Gr68a males, it cannot explain their increase in courtship latency, since this epoch of courtship occurs before song production.
Next, we compared copulation success, courtship behaviour and microhabitat choice among these same substrates.
Copulation success depends on the phenotypic differences between mating partners, the criteria of which are described later.
Male territorial behavior significantly predicted copulation success (ANOVA: F3,13 = 5.452, P = 0.012, r2 = 0.557).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com