Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
"Someone who copies doesn't make corrections because they haven't ever seen the changes.
Similar(59)
The head, like all other copies, does not capture the profound elusiveness of the original".
However, loss of different IR copies does not exclude the likelihood that conifers are monophyletic.
That copies don't count any more.
Other copies don't feel authentic to me.
Kindle copies don't qualify as having any editable information.
(The advertising copy doesn't mention him once).
Their copies do not violate existing law.
Though copies do not circulate often, they command high prices when they do.
The duplicated copies did not assemble into separate contigs, presumably because of high sequence similarity.
In both cases the duplicated gene copies do not harbor a mimp in their promoter.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com