The phrase "copied verbatim" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to text or information that has been reproduced exactly as it appears in the original source.
Example: "The report included several sections that were copied verbatim from the original research paper."
Alternatives: "reproduced exactly" or "transcribed word for word."
cf. Harper & Row, 471 U.S. at 565, 105 S.Ct. at 2233 ("the fact that a substantial portion of the infringing work was copied verbatim is evidence of the qualitative value of the copied material".).
See Harper & Row, 471 U.S. at 565 ("the fact that a substantial portIon of the infrInging work was copied verbatim is evidence of the qualitative value of the copied material"); Basic Books, 758 F. Supp. at 1533 ("the portions copied were critical parts of the books copied, since that is the likely reason the college professors used them In their classes").
[T]he fact that a substantial portion of the infringing work was copied verbatim is evidence of the qualitative value of the copied material, both to the originator and to the plagiarist who seeks to profit from marketing someone elseVs copyrighted expression.
And a chunk of one of the papers seems to have been copied verbatim from elsewhere.
Dow Jones produced examples of 107 news articles that were copied verbatim, or nearly verbatim, by Briefing.com.
Perhaps not surprisingly, these are the topics on which two-thirds or more of existing U.S. trade language was copied verbatim into the parallel sections of the TPP.
You want the right to copy verbatim other people's books, don't you?
"You want the right to copy verbatim other people's books, don't you?" Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist demanded.
Strategies used to incorporate source materials also remained largely unchanged, with learners continuing to copy verbatim from sources and acknowledging sources incorrectly.
You could make a case for postmodern ghosting in creative writing, but copying verbatim sentences from uncredited sources in a critical analysis is simply academic plagiarism.
Professor Lessig replied, "We want the right to copy verbatim works that should be in the public domain and would be in the public domain but for a statute that cannot be justified" either under the First Amendment or Congress's copyright power.
