Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Study coordinators review forms for incomplete data and answer computer-based questions programmed with eligibility criteria.
Similar(57)
Prior to study initiation at each site, investigators and study coordinators reviewed the definitions of each risk factor (see Additional file 1: Appendix 2) and received mandatory structured online training for ALI assessment.
Prior to study initiation at each site, investigators and study coordinators reviewed structured online training (http://depts.washington.edu/kclip/about.shtml) for ALI assessment and for definitions of each risk factor (see Appendix 1).
METHODS: A panel of five researchers and research coordinators reviewed the original SMQ (Rankin and Esteeves, 1997) and suggested an additional 42 items based on the review of the literature and their own experiences in research.
Study coordinators reviewed all survey tools daily for completeness and accuracy.
Program Coordinators reviewed the electronic clinic roster to identify eligible patients.
Raters and coordinators reviewed each tool for missing and discrepant items.
Finally, the national study coordinators reviewed the database, identified inconsistencies, and sent the correction report to the participating centers which were required to make the corrections [ 18].
The site and study coordinators reviewed the expanded notes and tape recordings, and interviewers were provided with feedback on their probing and expanded notes.
Beginning October 7, hospital site coordinators reviewed emergency department, ICU, and autopsy logs daily to identify patients who died or were admitted with any of the four suspicious clinical syndromes.
Cancers were further subdivided according to whether histological, haematological, or cytological confirmation (henceforth referred to as histological confirmation) was available or diagnosis had been made otherwise (i.e. clinical, instrumental diagnosis, etc).. Cancer Registry coordinators reviewed all records on histological type and site of cancers.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com