Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
convincing to
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "convincing to" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct form would be "convincing for" or "convincing to someone." Example: "The evidence presented was convincing to the jury."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Science
Alternative expressions(8)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
"Therefore it is our sense that a political process that will be convincing to both sides will also be convincing to curb the violence," he said.
News & Media
Sounds convincing to us.
News & Media
There's nothing remotely convincing to suggest so.
News & Media
They seemed pretty convincing to me.
News & Media
These companies have a lot of convincing to do.
News & Media
She was in extreme distress, convincing to several Sofitel employees.
News & Media
Mr. Naider's argument is not convincing to Mr. Zeidner.
News & Media
This made him convincing to many beyond his own community.
News & Media
Aspects of the findings are not convincing to some archaeologists.
News & Media
But on that, as on the economy, he still has much convincing to do.
News & Media
Some Germans say he has a lot of convincing to do.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Prefer using "convincing for" or "convincing to someone" to ensure grammatical correctness. For example: "The argument was convincing for the jury."
Common error
Avoid using "convincing to" in formal writing. Instead, opt for grammatically correct alternatives like "convincing for" or "persuasive for" to maintain clarity and professionalism.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "convincing to" typically functions as an adjective describing something that is persuasive or believable. However, its usage is often grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI points out, it should be replaced with "convincing for" or "convincing to someone."
Frequent in
News & Media
48%
Science
30%
Wiki
11%
Less common in
Formal & Business
4%
Encyclopedias
4%
Reference
3%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "convincing to" appears with relative frequency across varied sources, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically questionable. The more appropriate forms are "convincing for" or "convincing to someone". Using these alternatives ensures grammatical precision and enhances the credibility and persuasive impact of your writing. Due to its high percentage in News & Media and Science categories, you can find many examples of its usage. However, strive for correctness and consider context before incorporating the expression.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
persuasive for
Replaces 'to' with 'for' to denote the object being convinced.
compelling for
Uses 'compelling' instead of 'convincing' to emphasize the strength of the persuasion.
believable for
Substitutes 'convincing' with 'believable', focusing on the credibility of the subject.
plausible for
Emphasizes the apparent truthfulness of something.
credible for
Highlights the trustworthiness of the subject matter.
valid for
Focuses on the logical soundness or factual accuracy.
sound for
Indicates the reliability and reasonability.
cogent for
Highlights the clarity and effectiveness of the convincing argument.
satisfying for
Emphasizes that something meets the requirements.
acceptable for
Indicates the suitability for the user.
FAQs
What is the correct way to use "convincing"?
The correct usage depends on the context. Use "convincing for" (e.g., "The evidence was convincing for the jury") or "convincing to someone" (e.g., "The evidence was convincing to the judge") rather than "convincing to".
What can I say instead of "convincing to"?
You can use alternatives like "persuasive for", "compelling for", or "believable for" depending on the context.
Which is correct, "convincing to" or "convincing for"?
"Convincing for" is generally considered more grammatically correct than "convincing to". Another alternative is "convincing to someone".
How to use "convincing for" in a sentence?
Use "convincing for" to indicate who or what finds something persuasive. For example: "The presentation was very "convincing for" the investors".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested