Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
However, the converse implications do not hold.
Additionally, we provide comments on converse implications whenever appropriate.
However, the converse implications do not hold, in general.
Notice that (iii) and (iv)⇒ v)⇒ vi)⇒ vii) but the converse implications are not true.
Łukasiewicz supposes one accepts also the converse implications $CpLp$ and $CMpp$, as one would from a deterministic point of view.
It thus follows from basic logic that the three converse implications also hold, i.e., we have the full cycles (B1) (Rightarrow ) (C1) (Rightarrow ) (A1) (Rightarrow ) (B1), (B2) (Rightarrow ) (C2) (Rightarrow ) (A2) (Rightarrow ) (B2), and (B3) (Rightarrow ) (A3) (Rightarrow ) (B3).
Similar(52)
The converse implication usually fails.
The converse implication is clearly also true.
Now we prove the converse implication.
We will prove also the converse implication.
The converse implication does not hold, however.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com