Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(19)
To complement this analysis, the type of conversational scenario will also be accounted for.
In the last section, experimental evidence showed that cross-modal interactions could vary depending on the type of conversational scenario.
In their experiment, they used the 'Name Guessing Task' [9] conversational scenario which has a relatively low interactivity level.
Third, the impact of the conversational scenario on the assessment of the auditory and visual qualities is investigated.
It is interesting to note that toward high video or audio quality, ratings for both modalities do not differ depending on the conversational scenario.
This section will focus on measuring the actual influence of the conversational scenario on the evaluation of the perceived auditory and visual qualities.
Similar(41)
In the second experiment, pairs of participants were invited to carry out a set of interactive videotelephony conversations using different conversational scenarios.
They used short conversation test (SCT) scenarios defined in [15] which are close-to-natural conversational scenarios (e.g., ordering a pizza) and exhibit a middle to low level of interactivity.
It is also cramming Engkey with more conversational scenarios.
Three different conversational scenarios were used in the interactive experiment.
Differences between conversational scenarios were observed when at least one channel was impaired.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com