Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
The Circulation study found calcium scans to be a better predictor of coronary events than looking at conventional risk factors like blood pressure and cholesterol.
These are the big picture issues often missed off a conventional risk register, because the process tends to focus on the detailed listing of risks in various categories.
Some cardiologists, however, are still not convinced that scanning predicts heart-attack risk more reliably than conventional risk factors do, or that it helps patients.
Deconstructing anger can be tricky, and remains controversial, partly because anger is harder to measure than conventional risk factors like cholesterol, hypertension and diabetes.
Furthermore, conventional risk analysis methods are known to have a static structure, which introduces model uncertainty.
Many researchers have pointed out the deficiencies of conventional risk priority number (RPN) used in FMEA.
Safety-critical basic events (BE) in the FT model are determined using conventional risk importance measures.
Conventional risk assessment methodologies are often not carried out concurrently with process design.
The results are consistent with the results calculated by conventional risk evaluation method.
The conventional risk is a determinate value but the proposed fuzzy risk is an interval value.
Although the conventional risk factors are well understood and adequately treated, complications associated with atherosclerosis keep growing.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com