Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Identification of mycobacteria species were performed using conventional phenotypic tests [22].
A total of 434 isolates were identified and serotyped by conventional phenotypic tests.
Results were compared with those previously obtained by 16S rDNA sequencing and conventional phenotypic tests.
Clinical isolates of catalase-negative, gram-positive coccoid or coccobacillary bacteria with non-β hemolysis in our institute during 1997 2004 were subject to an identification aid by API 20 STREP, following the instruction manual, as an aid to conventional phenotypic tests.
Similar(56)
Rapid molecular diagnostics are valuable adjuncts to conventional phenotypic testing because they can quickly confirm clinically suspected MDR TB and have high agreement with other genotypic and phenotypic methods (7 – 10 ).
hydrophila, A. veronii, and A. caviae) were identified by.. .....) Additional conventional phenotypic testing would be needed to actually place these clinical isolates into either a species related Complex, e.g. A. hydrophila Complex, A. veronii Complex, or A. caviae Complex or to identify them to the level of an individual species designation.
Xpert for rifampicin resistance detection A. Xpert used as an initial test for rifampicin resistance replacing conventional phenotypic drug susceptibility testing as the initial test.
The isolates were characterized phenotypically by the use of conventional phenotypic and biochemical tests (Wayne 1984).
A simple, conventional set of phenotypic tests for Leuconostoc identification is proposed.
The isolates were characterized using conventional phenotypic Listeria identification tests and by the detection and analysis of L. monocytogenes-specific genes.
Use of conventional biochemical and phenotypic tests for the identification of NTM is currently discouraged; more rapid and specific methods are favored, including high-performance liquid chromatography analysis of mycolic acids and commercial molecular assays.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com