Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(14)
However, turbine efficiency is generally assumed to be constant in the conventional cycle design.
In the analyses, the net power generated is fixed at 30 MW with a marginal deviation in order to compare the results with the conventional cycle.
The performance evaluation of the novel cycle is compared with that of the conventional cycle without HRD in terms of moisture and energy transfer.
A comprehensive comparison with the reference unit revealed that GTCCpr with the proposed "recuperation adjustment" method can maintain a higher off-design efficiency and slightly lower design power output compared with the conventional cycle.
However, with lower TIT conditions, the optimal PR and the peak efficiency at a constant TIT of the LBCCGT cycle are relative low to that of the conventional cycle.
Based on the experimental results, the thermal coefficient of performance of the system has been improved to 1.2, almost twice the thermal coefficient of performance of the conventional cycle without HRD.
Similar(46)
As a result, removal in conventional cycles can increase the cost of electricity by 50%to70%0% [1].
Compared to conventional cycles, the Carnot-type cycle leads to COP increase by 4 70% depending on the application.
The corresponding specific exergy of the supply air is increased by nearly 30% when compared with the conventional cycles.
In order to compensate the defects of conventional cycles in some case studies, a novel improved transcritical CO2 cycle and two combined cycle designs are presented.
The study reviews three distinguished Maisotsenko gas turbine power cycles and their comparison with the conventional cycles, which shows the M-Cycle significance in power industry.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com