Exact(1)
A convenience random sample of 14 children was dentally reexamined in a one-week interval by the three pediatric dentists to determine the intra-examiner agreement.
Similar(59)
Second, the sampling methodology was by convenience non random sampling which may have biased the results.
Selection of the study unit at each stage was based on a mixed design of convenience and random samplings.
A number of studies inadequately reported several aspects of the methods: 13 did not describe their sampling approach and the remainder used a mix of purposive, convenience, and random sampling.
Variables to be taken into consideration included the study population (e.g., age, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status), data sources (e.g., cancer registries), sampling techniques (e.g., convenience sample, random general population sample), and the purpose of the indicators/measures (e.g., internal quality improvement).
The sample consisted of 30 diabetic adults in the experimental group and 30 in the control group attending the outpatient departments in the two private hospitals selected by convenience non-random sampling technique.
The sample consisted of 30 adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the experimental group and 30 in the control group of the two private hospitals selected by convenience non-random sampling technique.
Moreover, results may not be generalizable due to the small sample size based on convenience, non-random sampling, as well as the somewhat homogeneous ethnocultural backgrounds of the participants.
Design: The study design was prospective and quasi-experimental, and we used a convenience sample with random assignment.
A random convenience sample of medical notes from 92 separate patient day reviews over a 4 week period were analysed for documented versions of FLATHUGS VC.
(The use of a scaled identity matrix for initialization is mainly for convenience, and a random initialization matrix can also be employed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com