controversial distinction

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "controversial distinction" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a difference or separation between two concepts or ideas that is subject to debate or disagreement. Example: "The article explores the controversial distinction between free speech and hate speech, highlighting the complexities involved."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

This contrast between declarative and nondeclarative memory is sometimes lined up with a more controversial distinction between 'explicit' and 'implicit' memory: explicit memories, roughly, can be accessed verbally or otherwise by the subject, whereas implicit memory is memory without awareness.

SEP

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

It is, however, controversial whether the distinction between mathematical and physical content can be characterized without implementing a Field-like nominalization program.

SEP

The democratic legitimacy of TTIP remains to be verified since the controversial relation and distinction between lawful regulation, the fair and equitable treatment standard, and indirect expropriation under the "TTIP-regime" lack substantial empirical evidence.

Land Use Policy

However this finding is controversial as sexual distinction in vertebral cross-sectional area is partially explained by the larger stature and overall body size in men.

Plosone

Another much addressed and controversial issue concerns the distinction between dynamic and static existentials and the so-called pseudo-existentials.

Functional Linguistics

Although particular ways of drawing the distinction remain controversial, the key idea that representational beliefs themselves are motivationally inert is widely accepted.

SEP

While both the existence and the significance of this distinction are controversial, examples of each of these sorts of terms — should the distinction prove both real and significant — typically are not.

SEP

The validity of this distinction remains controversial; it is possible that regressive autism is a specific subtype, or that there is a continuum of behaviors between autism with and without regression.

Wikipedia

The discrimination between these two types of glioma is actually controversial, thus, a molecular distinction is necessary for better diagnosis.

BMC Cancer

The optimal surgical management remains controversial and a clear distinction between indications for one of both treatment options cannot be made on the basis of the current evidence in the literature.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

The distinction is a controversial one.

Crime Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "controversial distinction", clearly state the nature of the controversy and the different perspectives involved. This provides context and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "controversial distinction" if the distinction is merely nuanced or subtle, rather than genuinely debated among experts or the public. Using it inappropriately can exaggerate the importance or impact of the distinction.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "controversial distinction" functions as a noun phrase, where "controversial" is an adjective modifying the noun "distinction". It is used to describe a difference or separation that is subject to disagreement or debate. Ludwig AI confirms this with examples demonstrating its use in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

30%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "controversial distinction" is used to describe a difference or separation between two concepts or ideas that is subject to debate or disagreement. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's grammatically correct and appears in varied contexts, including science, news, and encyclopedias. While relatively rare, it's essential to use it appropriately, avoiding overstatement of the controversy. When employing this phrase, ensure that the nature of the controversy and the perspectives involved are clearly articulated to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "disputed difference" or "contentious differentiation" can be used depending on the intended nuance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

disputed difference

Emphasizes the disagreement surrounding the difference itself.

contentious differentiation

Highlights the argumentativeness of the differentiation.

debatable contrast

Focuses on the contrast and its susceptibility to debate.

questionable separation

Suggests doubt about the validity of the separation.

uncertain boundary

Highlights the ambiguity and lack of clarity in the boundary.

contested classification

Focuses on the disagreement over the classification.

divisive demarcation

Emphasizes the divisive nature of the boundary or limit.

arguable division

Highlights that the division is open to argument and discussion.

polarizing categorization

Suggests that the categorization creates opposing viewpoints.

disputable delineation

Focuses on the act of outlining or defining and its susceptibility to dispute.

FAQs

How can I use "controversial distinction" in a sentence?

You can use "controversial distinction" to describe a difference between two things that is subject to disagreement or debate. For example: "The article explores the "controversial distinction" between free speech and hate speech."

What's another way to say "controversial distinction"?

Alternatives include "disputed difference", "contentious differentiation", or "debatable contrast", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

What makes a distinction "controversial"?

A distinction becomes "controversial" when there is significant disagreement or debate about its validity, relevance, or implications. This often occurs when the distinction touches upon sensitive or complex issues.

Is it always necessary to explicitly state why a "controversial distinction" is controversial?

While not always strictly necessary, providing context about the nature of the controversy can enhance clarity and prevent misinterpretations. It is helpful to briefly explain the differing viewpoints or reasons for the disagreement.