Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
We outline the controller characterization and demonstrate closed-loop control of a Bruker DMASP microcantilever.
Similar(59)
The algorithm uses a formula, with parameters obtained from benchmark programs, to compute the delay of each node in the control/data flow graph for various micro-controller architectures (characterization data for MIPS R3000 and Motorola 68HC11 and 68332 are already available).
A recursive matrix inequality approach is developed to derive the sufficient conditions for the existence of the desired finite-horizon controllers, and the analytical characterization of such controllers is also given.
By using a combination of the stochastic analysis and Lyapunov functional approaches, sufficient conditions are derived for the existence of the desired controllers and then the characterization of such controllers is given via the semi-definite programme method.
The paper includes the design process of the controller, including the experimental characterization of the elements and the experimental results of such control.
The key idea is to use a Lyapunov based bounded robust controller, for which an explicit characterization of the region of robust closed-loop stability can be obtained, to provide a stability region within which any available MPC formulation can be implemented.
A parameterized characterization of the controllers is given in terms of the feasible solutions to the certain LMIs.
A parameterized characterization of the controllers is given in terms of the feasible solutions to the LMIs, which can be solved by various convex optimization algorithms.
The aggressiveness of a PI controller is defined and a quantitative characterization is given in relation to the ratio of the proportional and integral actions of the controller.
This paper provides new dilated linear matrix inequality (LMI) characterizations for continuous-time controller synthesis.
Parameterized characterizations for stabilizing the controller are given in terms of the feasibility solutions to the LMIs.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com