Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Lawmakers are hoping that the Assembly and Senate will coalesce behind a package of mayoral control revisions in time for a smooth transition to the new law.
Moreover, most systems lack support for the enforcement of quality control on inputs/outputs, and support for cycle control (revisions of workflows, input data, tools).
Similar(58)
There were 106 joints in the study of which 54 were revised for aseptic loosening and 52 were assigned to the control revision group.
Third, no control revision reconstructions with morselized cancellous bone grafts were made for comparison of stem subsidence.
There were 9 positive cultures with 8/54 positive cultures in the aseptic loosening group and 1/52 in the control revision group (p = 0.017, associated OR 47.7).
There were three patients in the aseptic loosening group and four patients in the control revision group who had an isolated elevated preoperative CRP.
There was no significant difference in the lifespan of the implant prior to revision between aseptic loosening (14 years) and control revision (10.3 years) groups (p = 0.054) (Table 1).
Fifty-four joints were revised for aseptic loosening of the implant (aseptic study group), and fifty-two joints underwent revision for other reasons (control revision group) such as isolated polyethylene wear (16/106), dislocation (12/106), periprosthetic fracture (8/106), and finally mechanical failure (16/106).
The second was a control revision group, which included patients undergoing revision surgery for isolated polyethylene wear with liner exchange, dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, and mechanical failure of an implant.
There was a significant difference (p = 0.033) in the gender distribution between the groups with females overrepresented in the control revision group (p = 0.033) and those patients with a history of smoking (p = 0.007).
There were 9 positive cultures in the study, eight (15%) positive cultures in the aseptic loosening group and 1 (2%) in our control revision group (p = 0.017, associated odds ratio of 47.7).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com