Exact(19)
The risk for ICU stays was higher among patients with zero controlled factors than among those with optimal control (HR 2.47; 95% CI 1.43 4.28).
When the analysis was limited to patients receiving Epoetin β at Hb⩽10 g dl−1, the authors identified no evidence for a negative impact on survival (Epoetin β vs control HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.70 1.40) and a favourable effect for disease progression (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57 0.94).
A strong and sustained improvement of survival was obtained with the antibody against the N-terminus of ADM: 50% of the animals treated with this antibody survived the CLP procedure over the observation period of 14 days (Figure 3) (NT-M vs. vehicle: HR = 0.068 (CI = 0.291 to 0.0159), p = 0.0003; NT-M vs. control: HR = 0.07717 (CI = 0.0189 to 0.315), p = 0.0004).
NPC with advanced clinical stage (stage IVA-IVB) had poor locoregional control (HR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.19 to 6.77, p =0.02) and those receiving NACT tended to have poor locoregional control (HR = 1.75, 95% CI: 0.74 to 4.16, p =0.20).
Ultra-short-acting β-blockers may be useful to control HR with minimal effects on cardiac function.
How do cells control HR to promote fork protection/restart and to prevent unscheduled and deleterious recombination events?
Similar(41)
The incidence of death among cases was 0.148 per child-year (95% CI 0.116 0.189) and they were ten times more likely to die than controls (HR 9.5, 95% CI 5.4 16.7).
Study results also indicated significantly decreased mortality risk for patients who underwent surgery versus controls (HR 0.76; P = 0.04).
Activation of the baroreceptor reflex generally controls HR and total peripheral resistance to maintain adequate pressure [ 25].
The HR for death from 61 180 days was significantly higher for CDAD patients than controls (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.47 2.72) (Table 4).
After adjusting for socioeconomic status and age in our multivariate model, time to childbirth was significantly longer for survivors than controls (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87 0.98) (Table 3).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com