control him

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "control him" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where someone is discussing the act of managing or influencing another person's behavior or actions. Example: "In order to maintain order in the group, it is essential to control him during discussions."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

I control him.

The New York Times

You can control him.

The New Yorker

We can control him.

The New Yorker

How else can you control him?

The New Yorker

'No, I couldn't control him.

The Guardian

Can I control him enough?

The Guardian - Film

She never could control him.

The New Yorker

We do not control him.

The Guardian

He needed a band to control him.

The Guardian - Music

But they don't control him financially.

The New York Times - Sports

And then you don't control him?" He suggests a compromise.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider the ethical implications of attempting to "control him". Focus on influence and guidance instead of domination.

Common error

Avoid using "control him" when you actually mean to support or guide him. Control implies a lack of autonomy, while support suggests empowerment.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "control him" functions primarily as a verb phrase, where "control" is a transitive verb requiring a direct object ("him"). It indicates the act of exerting influence or authority over someone. Ludwig AI confirms this usage with numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Wiki

12%

Encyclopedias

4%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Science

4%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "control him" is a very common expression used to describe the act of influencing or managing someone's behavior. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is grammatically correct and widely used. However, it's important to be mindful of the context in which it's used, as it can carry negative connotations related to power dynamics and autonomy. Alternatives such as "manage him" or "guide him" might be more appropriate depending on the intended meaning. The phrase appears most frequently in "News & Media" and "Wiki" sources, reflecting its broad applicability in various contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Keep him under control

Focuses on maintaining a state of order and preventing things from escalating.

Manage him

Focuses on guidance and oversight rather than direct control.

Influence him

Suggests a more subtle and persuasive approach to affecting his actions.

Direct him

Implies giving instructions and guidance to achieve a specific outcome.

Keep him in line

Implies enforcing rules or standards of behavior.

Have authority over him

Highlights the power dynamic and the right to give orders.

Keep him in check

Emphasizes preventing unwanted behavior or maintaining order.

Be in charge of him

Highlights the responsibility and authority for his actions and well-being.

Dominate him

Suggests a forceful and often oppressive level of control.

Have leverage over him

Implies using an advantage to exert influence or control.

FAQs

How can I use "control him" in a sentence?

You can use "control him" to describe the act of managing or influencing another person's behavior or actions. For example: "They tried to control him, but he was too independent."

What can I say instead of "control him"?

You can use alternatives like "manage him", "influence him", or "guide him" depending on the context.

What does it mean to "control him" in a relationship?

In a relationship, "control him" suggests attempting to dictate his actions, decisions, or feelings. This can be unhealthy and lead to conflict. Healthy relationships are based on mutual respect and understanding.

Is it ever okay to try to "control him"?

While "control him" often has negative connotations, there might be situations where limiting someone's actions is necessary for their safety or the safety of others. However, this should be approached with caution and consideration for their autonomy.